Books Vs. Movies
(4 of 4)
HOW THE BOOK WAS BETTER: It's hard to match wits with the woman who wrote, "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife." The movie doesn't try. It opens on a sunrise. The book is much funnier, the dialogue much cleverer, the social satire more nuanced. Oh, and some Austenites are spitting mad because the movie ends with a kiss.
HOW THE MOVIE IS BETTER: There's a lot more of the grit of everyday life in 18th century rural Britain that was commonplace to Austen but is new to us. Animals wander through the house. There's mud everywhere. Also, it ends with a kiss.
DEFINITIVE VERSION: The movie. Calm down: I'm kidding. The book, of course. But is there such a thing as too much Mr. Darcy?
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The World of China Inc.
- Pie
- In Italy, A Sex Scandal to Rival Berlusconi's
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Gospel of Glee: Is It Anti-Christian?
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Is Time Running Out to Dig Up South Korea's Mass Graves?
- India Still a Soft Terror Target a Year After Mumbai
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The World of China Inc.
- Pie
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Is Time Running Out to Dig Up South Korea's Mass Graves?
- Seoul: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- An African Miracle
- Fat Fees and Smoker Surcharges: Tough-Love Health Incentives
- In Italy, A Sex Scandal to Rival Berlusconi's







RSS