Letters: Feb. 13, 2006

• Share

(3 of 3)

Andrew Sullivan, in his essay "We Don't Need a New King George" [Jan. 23], was right to criticize President Bush's habit of attaching signing statements that give his interpretation of the legislation he signs. Taking the oath of office, Bush swore to "protect and defend" the Constitution. But his Administration is undermining that document's checks and balances. If lying under oath about an affair was reason enough to bring impeachment charges against President Bill Clinton, then there is cause 10 times over for impeaching Bush. Shame on him, and shame on us if we let him get away with it.

KAREN MONTGOMERY

Bethlehem, Pa.

The idea that the President can unilaterally transform legislation that Congress has passed by using a presidential signing statement to explain his actions is outrageous and contrary to the Constitution. No American wants the presidency to have such power.

MIKE FORD

Austin, Texas

In time of war, the President has a great degree of latitude granted by the Founding Fathers. Sullivan's assertion that Bush thinks he is above the law or is another King George is beyond ludicrous. Any President would have reacted the way Bush did after 9/11. Thank God the President has discharged his responsibilities in carrying out the global war on terrorists. We are all safer for it.

ROBERT GUERTIN

Jamestown, N.C.

Andrew Sullivan's blog, the Daily Dish, can be found at time.com