-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Will The Patients' Bill Arrive Alive?
Dem
Mccain-Edwards-Kennedy
APPEALS PROCESS Patients can ask the insurer for a timely internal review of a decision, and then appeal for an external, independent review by doctors. If there is a chance of irreparable harm while the review is pending, the patient can skip appeals and go straight to court.
RIGHT TO SUE After appeals are exhausted--whether or not the review has found in favor of the patient--patients or families can sue for damages in state court over medically reviewable decisions. Or they can sue in federal court for administrative decisions that cause irreparable injury or death. (They can't sue in both forums at the same time.)
DAMAGES In state court, patients or families can sue for whatever damages state law allows--in many states, such liabilities are uncapped. In federal cases, they can sue for economic damages and pain and suffering, and up to $5 million in punitive damages if the insurer acted flagrantly and in bad faith.
PHYSICIAN SAFEGUARDS Health plans are prohibited from offering financial incentives to doctors to limit medical services. Insurers are forbidden to punish doctors who advocate on a patient's behalf during the appeals process.
Breaux-Frist-Jeffords
APPEALS PROCESS Same internal appeal, though a bit slower--but the insurer gets to pick the doctors performing all external reviews. Patients need to exhaust all appeals before filing suit, but they can ask a court to order treatment if they can prove immediate and irreparable harm.
RIGHT TO SUE Patients or families can sue for damages in federal court over medically reviewable decisions, but only if the external review reverses the insurer's decision. No suits allowed in state court--which could pre-empt several state patients'-rights laws.
DAMAGES In federal court, economic and pain-and-suffering damages are capped at $500,000. Patients and families cannot sue for punitive damages.
PHYSICIAN SAFEGUARDS No provision on doctors who support patient appeals. Doesn't ban financial incentives to doctors to limit care but mandates a study of the issue by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- (Vetted) Question Time: Obama's Chinese Town Hall
- Australia Apologizes to Abused Child Migrants
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- Postcard from Minneapolis







RSS