-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Brain Sells
(2 of 2)
The field got a high-profile, scholarly boost two years ago when a study by Baylor College of Medicine in Houston which was published in the academic journal Neuron used FMRI technology to determine that cola drinkers subconsciously have warmer feelings for the Coca-Cola brand, and that gives Coke an edge over Pepsi, even though Pepsi performs as well as Coke in blind taste tests. Brain scanning is the field's dominant technology, but other technologies and techniques are used as well, often in conjunction with FMRIs. Magnetoencephalography (MEG), a technology that can read electrical signals pulsating from brain cells, is popular because it detects how quickly the brain reacts to stimulations. But unlike FMRI scans, it can't identify which parts of the brain are reacting. And that's important, because researchers say it's the interplay between the deeper, older brain where our emotions reside and the more logical neocortex that informs our decision making. And because the dance between the old and new brain areas occurs below our level of consciousness, it's information that focus groups or polls can never reveal.
Are there limits to neuromarketing's reach? FMRI studies are expensive. Brammer says a medium-sized study could cost between $94,000 and $188,000. Less-expensive options can also answer some marketing questions, however. For Unilever, Vienna's Walla recently used a startle-reflex method that measures muscle control of eye blinks to determine that eating ice cream makes people happier than eating yogurt or chocolate. Another drawback of scanners: lying in one is hardly a natural environment to watch TV or spot brands. But anticipated smaller versions that let subjects sit up under contraptions that resemble salon hair dryers should increase the comfort factor.
Marketers' use of neuroscience technologies has alarmed some consumer groups, mainly in the U.S., who fear it could lead to the discovery of an inner "buy button," which when pressed will turn us into robotic shoppers. Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, an advertising watchdog group, says if neuromarketing boosts advertising's effectiveness, even marginally, that's potentially dangerous. "We already have an epidemic of marketing-related diseases," ranging from obesity to type-2 diabetes to pathological gambling. And an even more intrusive technology may be looming. Cambridge University computer scientist Peter Robinson led a team, which included colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, that has developed software that enables computers to "read minds." A video camera focuses on 24 different facial features from which the software can often decipher people's mental states, including comprehension, boredom and excitement. Robinson says the technology could be used to find the right moment to sell someone a product online.
Walla rejects the idea of a buy button as "science fiction," and most researchers say the technology only allows them to observe how brains work, not control them. Adds Brammer: "I have got a lot of respect for the power of the human spirit to resist being manipulated." Also, Smidts maintains, "A lot of advertising doesn't work. It's hard to persuade and influence people."
There's no shortage of academic debate over the merging of neuroscience and marketing. The journal Nature Neuroscience, under the headline brain scam?, has editorialized that too many practitioners' claims remain unpublished in peer-reviewed journals. But the dearth of published results is largely the result of businesses wanting to keep their findings secret. Brammer admits that the data deficit leads to "some scientists interpreting what we're doing skeptically."
Can the marketplace be as effective an arbiter of quality scholarship as refereed journals? Perhaps. Deliver too many bad findings based on sloppy science and you won't remain in business for long. Since Neurosense's revenues are up threefold in the last year, you don't need a brain scanner to see that it and its legitimate competitors will likely be attracting business for some time to come.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The World of China Inc.
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- In Italy, A Sex Scandal to Rival Berlusconi's
- Pie
- The Gospel of Glee: Is It Anti-Christian?
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Is Time Running Out to Dig Up S Korea's Mass Graves?
- India Still a Soft Terror Target a Year After Mumbai
- Corruption Charges Loom for Pakistan's Pro-U.S. President
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The World of China Inc.
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- In Italy, A Sex Scandal to Rival Berlusconi's
- Is Time Running Out to Dig Up S Korea's Mass Graves?
- India Still a Soft Terror Target a Year After Mumbai
- Pie
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- When Thanksgiving Comes to Afghanistan
- Business Books







RSS