The Plan for War Against Iran
(6 of 7)
Given the chaos that a war might unleash, what options does the world have to avoid it? One approach would be for the U.S. to accept Iran as a nuclear power and learn to live with an Iranian bomb, focusing its efforts on deterrence rather than pre-emption. The risk is that a nuclear-armed Iran would use its regional primacy to become the dominant foreign power in Iraq, threaten Israel and make it harder for Washington to exert its will in the region. And it could provoke Sunni countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to start nuclear programs of their own to contain rising Shi'ite power.
Those equally unappetizing prospects--war or a new arms race in the Middle East--explain why the White House is kicking up its efforts to resolve the Iran problem before it gets that far. Washington is doing everything it can to make Iran think twice about its ongoing game of stonewall. It is a measure of the Administration's unity on Iran that confrontationalists like Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have lately not wandered off the rhetorical reservation. Everyone has been careful--for now--to stick to Rice's diplomatic emphasis. "Nobody is considering a military option at this point," says an Administration official. "We're trying to prevent a situation in which the President finds himself having to decide between a nuclear-armed Iran or going to war. The best hope of avoiding that dilemma is hard-nosed diplomacy, one that has serious consequences."
Rice continues to try for that. This week in New York City, she will push her partners to get behind a new sanctions resolution that would ban Iranian imports of dual-use technologies, like parts for its centrifuge cascades for uranium enrichment, and bar travel overseas by certain government officials. The next step would be restrictions on government purchases of computer software and hardware, office supplies, tires and auto parts--steps Russia and China have signaled some reluctance to endorse. But even Rice's advisers don't believe that Iran can be persuaded to completely abandon its ambitions. Instead, they hope to tie Iran up in a series of suspensions, delays and negotiations until a more pragmatic faction of leadership in Tehran gains the upper hand.
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular
-
Most Read
- Is Cheaper Oil A Good Thing?
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- What Will Break the Worldwide Panic Reaction?
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- Is He American Enough?
- The Obama Surge: Will It Last?
- Lessons From Asia's Last Meltdown: Act Fast
- Palin vs. "Palin": When SNL Parody Becomes Campaign Reality
- Debate Report Card: John McCain
- Paris For President! (Again)
-
Most Emailed
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Is Cheaper Oil A Good Thing?
- A Family Divided by Obama and McCain
- Just What the Economy Needs: A $5,000 Toilet
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- Is He American Enough?
- The Financial Crisis: What Would the Talmud Do?
- The Obama Surge: Will It Last?
- Can the G-7 Save the World from Financial Chaos?
- Restaurants Face Lean Times in the Economic Downturn
Mixx





RSS