My Spiritual Journey
Two days after I won the democratic nomination in my U.S. Senate race, I received an email from a doctor at the University of Chicago Medical School.
"Congratulations on your overwhelming and inspiring primary win," the doctor wrote. "I was happy to vote for you, and I will tell you that I am seriously considering voting for you in the general election. I write to express my concerns that may, in the end, prevent me from supporting you."
The doctor described himself as a Christian who understood his commitments to be comprehensive and "totalizing." His faith led him to strongly oppose abortion and gay marriage, but he said his faith also led him to question the idolatry of the free market and the quick resort to militarism that seemed to characterize much of President Bush's foreign policy.
The reason the doctor was considering voting for my opponent was not my position on abortion as such. Rather, he had read an entry that my campaign had posted on my website, suggesting that I would fight "right-wing ideologues who want to take away a woman's right to choose." He went on to write:
"Whatever your convictions, if you truly believe that those who oppose abortion are all ideologues driven by perverse desires to inflict suffering on women, then you, in my judgment, are not fair-minded. ... I do not ask at this point that you oppose abortion, only that you speak about this issue in fair-minded words."
I checked my website and found the offending words. They were not my own; my staff had posted them to summarize my pro-choice position during the Democratic primary, at a time when some of my opponents were questioning my commitment to protect Roe v. Wade. Within the bubble of Democratic Party politics, this was standard boilerplate, designed to fire up the base. The notion of engaging the other side on the issue was pointless, the argument went; any ambiguity on the issue implied weakness.
Rereading the doctor's letter, though, I felt a pang of shame. Yes, I thought, there were those in the antiabortion movement for whom I had no sympathy, those who jostled or blocked women who were entering clinics; those who bullied and intimidated and occasionally resorted to violence. But those antiabortion protesters weren't the ones who occasionally appeared at my campaign rallies. The ones I encountered usually showed up in the smaller communities that we visited, their expressions weary but determined as they stood in silent vigil outside whatever building in which the rally was taking place, their handmade signs or banners held before them like shields. They didn't yell or try to disrupt our events, although they still made my staff jumpy. The first time a group of protesters showed up, my advance team went on red alert; five minutes before my arrival at the meeting hall, they called the car I was in and suggested that I slip in through the rear entrance to avoid a confrontation.
"I don't want to go through the back," I told the staffer driving me. "Tell them we're coming through the front."
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular
-
Most Read
- 24 Words the CED Wants to Exuviate (Shed)
- Can McCain Map Out a Comeback Strategy?
- Will Palin's Obama-Terrorist Speech Backfire?
- Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin
- Can Obama's Grass-Roots Army Win Missouri?
- If Women Were More Like Men: Why Females Earn Less
- Maybe We Should Blame God for the Subprime Mess
- Europe Scrambles as the Credit Crisis Goes Global
- What's Behind McCain's Nosedive
- Klein: Palin Was Fine, but This Debate Was No Contest
-
Most Emailed
- Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin
- Maybe We Should Blame God for the Subprime Mess
- 24 Words the CED Wants to Exuviate (Shed)
- If Women Were More Like Men: Why Females Earn Less
- Klein: Palin Was Fine, But This Debate Was No Contest
- The End of Prosperity?
- Can Obama's Grassroots Army Win Missouri?
- South Koreans Are Shaken by a Celebrity Suicide
- Hangman, Spare that Word: The English Purge Their Language
- Credit Default Swaps: The Next Crisis? - TIME
Mixx





RSS