Welcome to Wi-Fi-Ville

(3 of 3)
Even free municipal wi-fi has one price that some find too steep: loss of privacy. Users aren't always comfortable knowing a government-run operation can track their searches for advertising or limit their access to websites. Culver City, Calif., and Adel, Ga., use software to prevent people from surfing porn and downloading copyrighted material. "I made a decision we shouldn't be spending taxpayer dollars on this," says John Richo, Culver City's information-technology director. Users must agree to "limited" Internet access and waive First Amendment claims arising from the city's decision to block sites. Civil-liberties groups are worried that governments may still be practicing content-based discrimination, a First Amendment violation, since filters often overreach and block perfectly legal material. "I think the Supreme Court would look skeptically at this approach," says John Morris, staff counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology.
But like other questions that municipal wi-fi raises, it will be money, politics and even dog bites that ultimately will determine the answers. •
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
Most Popular »
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? Ten Questions and Answers
- Ice Age vs. Transformers: It's a Draw!
- Why Obama's Afghan War Is Different
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- The Challenge That Awaits Obama in Moscow
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- Searching for Palin's 'Hot Photos'
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? Ten Questions and Answers
- Why Obama's Afghan War Is Different
- Germany's Bright Idea: Street Lighting on Demand
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Why VW and Porsche are On a Collision Course
- The Honduran Coup: How Should the U.S. Respond?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live







RSS