Good General, Bad Mission
American General David Petraeus, in flight from Tikrit to Baghdad, Iraq
You have to achieve very rapid progress to show people your intentions are good," Lieut. General David Petraeus told the Philadelphia Inquirer in October 2003, explaining how he and the 101st Airborne Division had brought peace and civility to the city of Mosul. It was one of the few early success stories of the war in Iraq--and then, within a year after Petraeus left, it all fell apart. What happened in Mosul, despite the best efforts of an enlightened U.S. general, is particularly instructive now that Petraeus has been given the far more difficult job of securing Baghdad in the midst of a civil war.
Petraeus did move rapidly in Mosul. With 20,000 troops at his disposal, he was able to establish an overwhelming presence in the streets. U.S. soldiers walked beats like police officers and were stationed in local patrol bases, the equivalent of precinct houses. They were instructed to treat the Iraqis with respect. Knocking down doors was replaced by knocking on doors. When force was used, the Inquirer reported, "A task force is sent into a neighborhood to clean up and take claims for any damages ...'Will this take more bad guys off the streets than it creates?' is one of Petraeus'" guiding principles. The judicious use of force was effective: among the bad guys taken off the street were Saddam Hussein's sociopathic sons Uday and Qusay.
In May 2003, within weeks after he arrived, Petraeus staged elections for a city council and began to disburse funds to clean schools, reopen factories, fix potholes and establish recreation programs. He was, in effect, the mayor of Mosul. The tactics Petraeus used were well known to a tiny cadre of military intellectuals in the Pentagon: they were classic counterinsurgency methods, and they were scorned by most of the brass (and by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld), who thought that nation building was a job for social workers, not soldiers. Even though counterinsurgency seemed to be working in Mosul, the Pentagon wasn't impressed.
In January 2004, Rumsfeld replaced the 101st Airborne in Mosul with a Stryker Brigade, one of his prized innovations. Instead of patrolling the streets on foot, the Strykers--about 5,000 strong, one-quarter the number of troops that Petraeus had at his disposal--dashed about in high-tech armored vehicles. They didn't do any of the local governance that Petraeus had done. They were occupiers, not builders, and put Iraqis in control of civic order. Within months, Mosul descended into chaos. "You win this thing with boots on the ground," a Stryker Brigade officer told a Knight-Ridder reporter in January 2005, "not by throwing more vehicles at the place."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Why American Kids Are Brats
- Watch: Dan Savage Leaves Stephen Speechless on 'Colbert Report'
- Androgynous Model Andrej Pejic Pushes the Fashion World's Limits
- 'Anonymous' Knocks CIA Site Offline
- It's Official: Linsanity Is for Real
- Kate Middleton's Amazing Fashion Evolution
- 10 Things We (Still) Kinda Hate About The Phantom Menace
- Desperately Seeking Susan Powell: A Best Friend's Quest
- World Press Photo Awards Announced
- The Art of Nazi Hunting: How Israel's Mossad Found Adolf Eichmann
- The Upside Of Being An Introvert (And Why Extroverts Are Overrated)
- Why Is Your Boss Moving to Brazil?
- Friends With Benefits
- Desperately Seeking Susan Powell: A Best Friend's Quest
- Jailed Polygamist Warren Jeffs Prepares His Flock for Doomsday
- Halftime and Hyperbole
- Harvard's Hoops Star Is Asian. Why's That a Problem?
- DEA: Mexican Gov. Got Millions in Drug Cash
- How City Lights Are Snuffing Out the Stars
- Why Your DNA Isn't Your Destiny




