What's a Resume Got to Do with It?

(2 of 2)

But is pre-eminent ability a reliable predictor of success? It doesn't guarantee victory at the polls. Henry Clay was a master of legislative finesse who helped broker the Missouri Compromises of 1820-21, a deal between slave states and free states that kept the two sides from each other's throats for 30 years. Yet he failed to become President in three tries. Great achievements don't guarantee great presidencies even when the pre-eminent man wins. The Eisenhower Administration, scorned by eggheads of the left and right while it was going on, has been revised upward by later scholars, and a similar process is lifting Grant's presidency from the cellar to which an unholy alliance of neo-Confederates and genteel reformers had consigned it. But neither man will ever be considered as great in peace as he was in war.

There have also been ordinary-seeming politicians who became epochmaking Presidents. After the 1932 Democratic Convention picked New York Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt, journalist H.L. Mencken described him as a man "whose competence was plainly in doubt." The Republican nomination of one-term Illinois Congressman Abraham Lincoln in 1860 brought this sneer from diarist George Templeton Strong: "He cut a great many rails, and worked on a flatboat in early youth; all which is somehow presumptive evidence of his statesmanship."

Statesmanship is an art, which means there is always room for inspiration, and for grace. We are right to look for a record of pre-eminent ability when we can find it. But the basic doctrine of republican government, that all men are created equal, can be a surprise bonus for some leaders, as well as a guarantee of rights for all of us. Sometimes greatness appears in unlikely places, even in ordinary pols from Illinois.

Brookhiser is a historian and author of What Would the Founders Do? Our Questions, Their Answers