Taking Aim At the Taliban

(2 of 2)
The Bush Administration has asked Congress for $8.6 billion to build up the Afghan National Security Forces over the next two years, with the international community contributing an additional $1.7 billion a year thereafter. (Considering that its fiscal 2005 GDP was $7.1 billion, Afghanistan can hardly be expected to foot the bill.) "It's a bargain," says Major General Robert Durbin, former commander of the Combined Security Transition Command in Afghanistan. "We are spending $15 billion a year now for the presence of U.S. forces. So for a fraction of the cost, you have the Afghans pick up the fight. So we have the option, if we so choose, to reduce our forces, and that's a good return on investment." Staff Sergeant George Beck Jr., a U.S. soldier training new recruits at the KMTC, says, "It's all about crawl, walk, run. Right now the Afghan army is at a crawl. In a few more years it will walk, and in 10 it will run. Then we can all go home."
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit: The Five Best Explanations
- Ice Age vs. Transformers: It's a Draw!
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? 10 Questions and Answers
- Robert McNamara Dies: No Escape from Vietnam
- Why Obama's Afghan War Is Different
- Awful Library Books
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- China: At Least 140 Dead in Xinjiang Province Clashes
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- South Africa: How to Do the Garden Route
- Awful Library Books
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- China: At Least 140 Dead in Xinjiang Province Clashes
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? 10 Questions and Answers
- Michael Jackson's Estate: Saved by the Beatles
- Why Sarah Palin Quit: The Five Best Explanations
- Robert McNamara Dies: No Escape from Vietnam







RSS