Taking Aim At the Taliban

(2 of 2)
The Bush Administration has asked Congress for $8.6 billion to build up the Afghan National Security Forces over the next two years, with the international community contributing an additional $1.7 billion a year thereafter. (Considering that its fiscal 2005 GDP was $7.1 billion, Afghanistan can hardly be expected to foot the bill.) "It's a bargain," says Major General Robert Durbin, former commander of the Combined Security Transition Command in Afghanistan. "We are spending $15 billion a year now for the presence of U.S. forces. So for a fraction of the cost, you have the Afghans pick up the fight. So we have the option, if we so choose, to reduce our forces, and that's a good return on investment." Staff Sergeant George Beck Jr., a U.S. soldier training new recruits at the KMTC, says, "It's all about crawl, walk, run. Right now the Afghan army is at a crawl. In a few more years it will walk, and in 10 it will run. Then we can all go home."
-
« Previous
1
|
2
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular »
-
Most Read
- Is Cheaper Oil A Good Thing?
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Is Barack Obama American Enough?
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- Palin vs. "Palin": When SNL Parody Becomes Campaign Reality
- A Family Divided by Obama and McCain
- The Obama Surge: Will It Last?
- Can the G-7 Save the World from Financial Chaos?
- Just What the Economy Needs: A $5,000 Toilet
- Europeans Rush to Coordinate Meltdown Plan
-
Most Emailed
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Is Cheaper Oil A Good Thing?
- Just What the Economy Needs: A $5,000 Toilet
- A Family Divided by Obama and McCain
- Is Barack Obama American Enough?
- The Financial Crisis: What Would the Talmud Do?
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- Finding One Economic Bright Spot on Main Street
- October 11, 2008 - October 17, 2008 - Cartoons of the Week - TIME
- The Obama Surge: Will It Last?
Mixx





RSS