What Ad Slump?
But a funny thing happened to the networks on the road to ruin. Although the American economy is still struggling to emerge from the recession, advertisers have started throwing money at the national broadcasters. Gobs of it.
When last spring's up-front market closed, the six networks had accepted a record $8.2 billion in commitments for advertising time in the upcoming season, up substantially from the previous year's depressed $7 billion total. Even better, cancellation rates over the summer for those orders were only about 5%, a big improvement over the nerve-jangling 10% to 15% rates last year. Comparably low cancellation rates are starting to register for the first quarter of 2003. All this has left relatively little ad time available in the so-called scatter market, where advertisers who prefer to buy time at the last minute come to shop. The scarcity, combined with surprisingly strong demand, has sent prices soaring.
"We got premiums of between 25% and 40% in scatter" above the prices fetched last spring, says Joseph Abruzzese, the former president of sales for Viacom's CBS Television, who just left to take over ad sales at cable's Discovery Networks, a unit of Discovery Communications. And that was after CBS leveraged last season's muscular prime-time performance into 10% to 12% up-front rate increases, especially for such younger-skewing hits as Survivor, Everybody Loves Raymond and CSI.
Network TV is outperforming most other media. Up-front sales for cable TV were up about 14% from last year, but revenues for the first six months of the year were off 10%, according to Competitive Media Reporting. Ad revenues of local newspapers climbed 6% in the same period, but those of national newspapers were down 6%. Magazine ad pages ticked up 2.6% in September, according to the Publishers Information Bureau, but ad-page totals are still down almost 7% for the first nine months of the year. Radio revenues, says the Radio Advertising Bureau, have shown a 3% gain so far this year, after suffering a 7.5% decline last year.
In a dicey economy, the networks appear to have played their cards shrewdly. Broadcasters sold a higher than usual proportion of their ad time last spring about 85%, vs. the more typical 75%. They not only got their high prices up front but also created a squeeze for the few spots left this fall. Yet the high prices reflect an increase in demand, not just a contraction of supply. Jon Nesvig, sales president of News Corporation's Fox Broadcasting Co., says his network has seen a big boost in advertisers seeking spots in sports programming (demand that was depressed last fall, in part because of Sept. 11) as well as from advertisers that spend heavily inprime time, such as theatrical films andhome video, carmakers and national retailers.
Why, at a time when the advertising market for much of the rest of the media is still uncertain, are the networks seeing such rosy times? "It's counterintuitive," admits Tim Spengler, executive vice president at Initiative Media, a media-buying agency that billed more than $10 billion in U.S. advertising last year. Historically, he points out, significant increases in ad spending don't occur until a weak economy has begun to turn around. "What we've seen instead," Spengler says, "are clients saying, 'We need to go for it. We need to support our brands for the long-term viability of those brands,'" regardless of the economy's overall sluggishness.
The boom in ad sales may also be an acknowledgment that network TV, for all its woes, remains the only way to deliver commercial messages to vast numbers of potential customers at exactly the same time. In an increasingly fragmented TV world--89 viewing choices in the average home, according to Nielsen Media Research that reach is arguably more valuable than ever. Though the six networks' share of the viewing pie has shriveled to 56% (compared with 90% for just three networks as recently as 1980), an advertiser would have to buy spots on several cable channels, perhaps dozens, to reach a comparable audience. "I think this year advertisers seemed to get a little more faith," says Fox's Nesvig. "They said, 'Yeah, this really does move product.'"
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- The H1N1 Pandemic: Is a Second Wave Possible?
- Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill: Inspired by the U.S.
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Tiger Gets Mulligan from the TV Networks
- Europe vs. Google: The Next Chapter
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The Troubles at Kroger: Frugal Consumers
- Protests Mount Against Israel's Settlement Freeze
- For Africans Seeking Asylum in Israel, Dangers Abound
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Health Reform: The Pros and Cons of Expanding Medicare
- The Job Market: Is a College Degree Worth Less?
- Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill: Inspired by the U.S.
- Europe vs. Google: The Next Chapter
- The Troubles at Kroger: Frugal Consumers
- The H1N1 Pandemic: Is a Second Wave Possible?
- Remarks of President Barack Obama: Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
- Protests Mount Against Israel's Settlement Freeze
- Tiger Gets Mulligan from the TV Networks





RSS