Skipping Chemo
WORTH IT? The side effects can be brutal
The results are based on an examination of the medical records of more than 5,000 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1991 and 1997. According to Dr. Xianglin Du, assistant professor of internal medicine and geriatrics at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston and lead author of the study, there was "a clear divergence between recommendations from the National Institutes of Health and what is seen in clinical practice." The NIH guidelines, developed by experts in the field and released in November 2000, found "substantial" benefit from chemotherapy for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women up to age 70 and recommended post-surgical chemo in all cases in which tumors were greater than 1 cm in diameter.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
For the NIH, that's a rousing endorsement. So why are so many women ages 65 to 69 opting out?
I suspect there are a couple of reasons, one good and one not so good. The first probably stems from the definition of substantial benefit. While chemotherapy is typically thought of as life-prolonging (rather than lifesaving), its benefits definitely fall off with age. According to the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, women 50 and younger were 27% less likely to die within 10 years of surgery if they were also treated with chemo. By contrast, women 60 to 69 had their 10-year mortality rate reduced by only 8% with post-surgical chemotherapy.
The other reason seems to be a misconception about the risks and side effects of chemo. These can include impaired thought processes and increased risk of infections, and many older women believe they won't tolerate all of this as well as younger women do. That's a view not shared by many doctors. "For an otherwise healthy older woman," says Du, "the toxicities of chemotherapy should be no different than for a younger woman."
For patients and doctors alike, it's this balance of risk and benefit that ultimately decides. Dr. Alfred Chang, chief of surgical oncology at the University of Michigan Medical School, believes most women will do what their doctor recommends if the choice is properly presented. He suggests that oncologists need to be more aggressive in explaining chemotherapy's benefits. Having never had to go through it myself, I have difficulty imagining all the factors a woman young or old weighs when considering chemo. It's her life, and she has to make the call. All I would ask is that she arm herself with the facts before she decides.
Dr. Gupta is a neurosurgeon and a correspondent for CNN
Most Popular »
- Facebook's Secret Code
- The Job Market: Is a College Degree Worth Less?
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- The Afghanistan Surge: How Will the Taliban Respond?
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The Job Market: Is a College Degree Worth Less?
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- How Do Countries Determine Their Time Zones?
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Study: Eating Soy Is Safe for Breast-Cancer Survivors
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- The Afghanistan Surge: How Will the Taliban Respond?
- The Chicago Suspect: Are Pakistani Jihadis Going Global?





RSS