Betting on the Wrong Horse
Last year Mao wanted to boost production to ride a trend of restaurants' serving tea in paper cups with colorful plastic holders. Although he had plenty of collateral in the form of sales contracts, machinery and inventory, lenders wouldn't grant him even a small line of credit to maintain a steady supply of paper. To raise funds, Mao sold his house and moved into a space above his office. That financing delay, he fears, has cost him customers who will go instead to state-owned companies with better access to capital. "The government sees state enterprises as its sons, so it helps them," Mao says dejectedly. "I get nothing, so someone else will drink up my market."
But despite economic reforms and the elevation of capitalists into the ranks of the Communist Party, small firms like Mao's remain cut off from many of the resources that grease the wheels of commerce. Like their counterparts everywhere, China's grassroots entrepreneurs gripe about taxes and bureaucratic obstacles. Their biggest complaint, however, is their inability to get bank loans. In a recent survey of 600 private companies in Sichuan by the IFC, access to financing was cited as the No. 1 problem, far ahead of unfair competition and corruption.
The reason: China's antiquated and deeply indebted banking system still lends mainly to lumbering state-owned enterprises, not private companies. Although authorities have been allowing thousands of these uncompetitive state vestiges to fail—since 1995, 56 million factory workers have lost their jobs—thousands more remain on life support, enjoying a steady supply of government-directed "policy loans" that will in all likelihood never be paid back. China's four biggest banks are technically insolvent because they are owed an estimated $500 billion in nonperforming state-enterprise loans. Yet, according to the Asian Development Bank (ADB), state firms continue to soak up approximately 70% of all loans.
Turned away by banks, Sichuan's budding entrepreneurial class must rely on unconventional lenders, including pawnbrokers and loan sharks, to meet its capital requirements. Liu Qingrong, for example, borrowed money from friends and family to set up a Chinese medicine factory in 1992. Within two years, her traditional remedies were outselling those produced by her biggest state-owned competitor by a margin of 5 to 1. But her rival, which was backed by local officials, still received every advantage, including governmental assistance to raise capital via a stock-market listing. "It was bitter medicine," Qingrong recalls.
Despite competition, her 300-employee company has managed to expand, using its $10 million in assets to secure small loans from banks. But obtaining financing still challenges her creativity. In 2000 she bought two ailing state-run factories, borrowing heavily from a real estate developer she knew to fund the purchases. Such alliances sometimes involve dangerous trade-offs: last year Qingrong was obligated to guarantee a $200,000 loan made to one of her benefactors, accepting that she would be on the hook if it defaulted. "I was terrified," she says. "If we'd had to repay, we would have had to stop production."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Rachel Uchitel: Tiger Woods' Alleged Mistress
- China Vs. Disney: The Battle for Mulan
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- How Tiger Woods Can Survive the Scandal
- World's Most Shocking Apology: Oprah to James Frey
- What to Do About Europe's Secret Nukes
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- How Will Tiger Woods' Apology Affect His Image? A TIME Debate
- Winners and Losers from Black Friday Weekend
- Executive Privilege for Obama's Social Secretary?
- Advertisements for Themselves
- New York City: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- The Stolen Generation
- Apartheid's Victims as Victimizers
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power
- BATTLE OF KOREA: Across the Parallel
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Red China: Dance of the Scorpion
- How Air Pollution Can Damage the Heart
- Should You Stay Together For The Kids?





RSS