Letters

Pea

ce Is Hell

"Young soldiers will continue to die in Iraq until the U.S. realizes it hasn't cornered the market on pride and love of country."
BILL STRUBBE
Oakland, Calif.


LATEST COVER STORY
Mind & Body Happiness
Jan. 17, 2004
 

SPECIAL REPORTS
 Coolest Video Games 2004
 Coolest Inventions
 Wireless Society
 Cool Tech 2004


PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS
 At The Epicenter
 Paths to Pleasure
 Quotes of the Week
 This Week's Gadget
 Cartoons of the Week


MORE STORIES
Advisor: Rove Warrior
The Bushes: Family Dynasty
Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency


CNN.com: Latest News

Your report "Life Under Fire," about the troops in Iraq, bore sad testimony to the failed postwar campaign [IRAQ: BATTLING THE CHAOS, July 14]. While Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld spars with journalists over the precise meaning of guerrilla war, Americans are suffering casualties on a daily basis, and their attempts to help the Iraqi people rebuild a country sputter and stall in the face of a security nightmare. No one in the U.S. government or military can take pride in the postwar situation. Instead of planning to protect Iraqis' most precious resources, we became helpless witnesses to the chaotic looting and sabotage of an entire country.
HARRY TUBMAN
Pleasant Valley, Conn.

I am sick of calls for the coalition forces to leave Iraq. The violence being perpetrated there is committed by gangs, some motivated by politics, others by criminal instincts; some are supporters of Saddam Hussein, others his most ardent opponents. Imagine if the coalition forces did withdraw! The slaughter that would follow would be devastating. The coalition forces are performing a function vitally needed by the Iraqi people and welcomed by most of them. The troops are acting under incredibly difficult circumstances. They are all that stands between Iraq and total chaos.
TONY SOLMS
Tzaneen, South Africa

Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, is an extraordinary man, and he is doing everything he can to help Iraq, which is badly in need of a new order. In guerrilla warfare, the most important strategy is to win the people's hearts. We need to advertise why we are in Iraq, get the Iraqi people on our side, let them help us eliminate the bad influences. Air daily TV and radio announcements on Iraq's current situation and what the U.S. is doing to change it. Make clear to the Iraqis the U.S.'s goals and objectives. The more the Iraqi people see and hear about what we are doing for them, the more they will be convinced of our purpose.
ROBERT MA
San Diego

You quoted Bremer As asking, "what's the alternative [to the U.S.'s rebuilding efforts]? Do you really think Iraq would be better off if we left?" My answer to that is yes. When the war started, I thought it was justified. I felt I should support my President in his decision, even though I have family members and friends in the military. Now the war is "over," yet U.S. soldiers are still being killed. How many more U.S. service members have to be killed before the troops can be pulled out for good?
JUDY FALLON
Shrewsbury, Mass.

Peace is not hell, contrary to your cover headline. There will never be peace so long as violence is used to attain it. President Bush and the military are not after peace; they are after power and control. Peace can be obtained only by nonviolence, understanding and cooperation. Many members of the coalition forces are dying, but it is not peace that is killing them; it is violence and the Bush Administration's goals.
NICK ALVA
Cotati, Calif.

The U.S. is like an adolescent male who has just found out that his girlfriend is pregnant. We thought the invasion of Iraq was going to be fun and fast. Now, to our astonishment, we learn that misbehavior has consequences. We should never have gone into Iraq. But we have to finish what we started, even if it is messy and inconvenient.
HERBERT K. LEA
Lookout Mountain, Tenn.

How many more Americans will die in Iraq before we cave in and exit the country in shame? Let's send in enough troops with the right expertise to get the job finished.
BRUCE HANKINS
Batesville, Ark.

Spoils of War

I was thoroughly disgusted to read that American soldiers had looted and vandalized the airport in Baghdad [IRAQ: BATTLING THE CHAOS, July 14]. Such acts show a gross lack of leadership on the part of the officers. During my 31 years in the U.S. Navy, including two tours commanding naval facilities in foreign countries, I never would have tolerated such conduct. I am proud of my country and want to show its best qualities. As for the comment by a U.S. military official that "soldiers do this stuff all the time, everywhere. It's warfare"--that is a total cop-out. How can we possibly aspire to be the leader of the world if we can't even organize and properly lead our military personnel?
JON C. MCKENZIE
CAPTAIN, U.S.N. (RET.) Fairfax, Va.

Intervening Interests

Michael Elliott stated that the Bush Administration needs to clearly explain why it wants to intervene in places like Liberia that do not appear to pose a direct threat to the U.S. [GLOBAL AGENDA, July 14]. He noted that "dangers await any Administration that strays from the national interest as the lodestar of its policy." I disagree and support U.S. intervention in troubled countries for humanitarian purposes. Bush should definitely send troops to Liberia, regardless of whether doing so is a matter of national interest for the U.S. On many occasions, the U.S. has been way too slow in taking action, most notably during the beginning of World War II and in Rwanda.
MICHAEL SWIECA
New York City

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
CHRISTINE LINDBERG of Oxford's U.S. dictionary program, on why unfriend was chosen as Word of the Year by the New Oxford American Dictionary; it refers to removing someone on a social-networking site like Facebook
For use in rail of Articles page or Section Fronts pages. Duplicate and change name as necesssary to distinguish.

Time.com on Digg

POWERED BY digg

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
CHRISTINE LINDBERG of Oxford's U.S. dictionary program, on why unfriend was chosen as Word of the Year by the New Oxford American Dictionary; it refers to removing someone on a social-networking site like Facebook

Stay Connected with TIME.com