We're All Glamorous!
(2 of 2)
So is genuine, old-school glamour a dead end as a marketing strategy? Has it been replaced by its chintzy cousin, glitz? While it's true that glamour is no longer reserved for the lucky few, the original definition survives more or less intact. Consumers respond to celebrity, individual style, mystery and scarcity. Snob-appeal companies like Harry Winston, Tiffany & Co. and Neiman Marcus certainly have an easier time, since they own the upper end, yet in Tiffany's case can still sell $50 trinkets.
If Whirlpool can pull off a glamorous product introduction, any brand can apply a little gloss. The mystery therefore extends to getting it right. The plethora of bad glamour out there makes good stuff look even better. Given the clutter that chokes our every day, real glamour may even be the last marketing strategy with any dignity.
Ellen Ratchye-Foster analyzes emerging consumer trends for luxury brands
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test
- Before and After D-Day: Rare Color Photos
- A Diamond Jubilee
- Marilyn Monroe: Early Unpublished Photos
- 15-Year-Old Creates Test for Pancreatic Cancer
- Etan Patz: After 33 Years, an Arrest in the Disappearance of the 'Milk-Carton Boy'
- Vintage Vegas: Rare Photos of a Desert Boomtown
- 10 Dangerous Products You Might Have in Your Home
- Detention of Chinese Fishermen Fuels Anger With North Korea, But Rift Unlikely
- Why People Stick with Cancer Screening, Even When It Causes Harm
- Researchers Probe the Potential Health Benefits of Palm Oil
- A Visit with Turkey's Controversial Religious Movement
- Feeding the Planet Without Destroying It
- Bubble on the Potomac
- Falcon's Liftoff: How a Private Firm Could Change Space Exploration
- The Fatal Flight of the Superjet 100: Why Did It Slam Into a Mountain?
- Learning That Works
- The Man Who Remade Motherhood
- Bibi's Choice
- Seoul: 10 Things to Do




