Health Care Can Be Cured: Here's How
Americans tend to believe they have the best health care in the world, but in truth it is a second-rate system and destined to get a lot worse and much more expensive.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
It need not be this way.
The simplest and most cost-effective remedy is one that is considered untouchable in the U.S. because of the huge lobbying forces arrayed against it. Indeed, neither presidential candidate has come close to offering such a comprehensive solution. The remedy: provide universal coverage and create one agency to collect medical fees and pay claims. This would eliminate the staggering overlap, bureaucracy and waste created by thousands of individual plans. Under a single-payer system, all health-care providers doctors, hospitals, clinics would bill one agency for their services and would be reimbursed by the same agency. Every American would receive basic health care, including essential prescription drugs and rehabilitative care. Anyone who needed to be treated or hospitalized could receive medical care without having to wrestle with referrals and without fear of financial ruin.
Radical? We already have universal health care and a single-payer system for everybody age 65 and over: it's called Medicare. For years, researchers and health-care professionals have advocated a similar plan for the rest of the population, but no plan has ever got far in the legislative process because of fierce opposition by the health-care industry. To discredit the single-payer idea, insurers, HMOs, for-profit hospitals and other private interests play on Americans' long-standing fears of Big Government. In truth, it is the private market that has created a massive bureaucracy, one that dwarfs the size and costs of Medicare, the most efficiently run health-insurance program in the U.S. in terms of administrative costs. Medicare's overhead averages about 2% a year. In a 2002 study for the state of Maine, Mathematica Policy Research Inc. concluded that administrative costs of private insurers in the state ranged from 12% to more than 30%. That isn't surprising because unlike Medicare, which relies on economies of scale and standardized universal coverage, private insurance is built on bewildering layers of plans and providers that require a costly bureaucracy to administer, much of which is geared toward denying claims.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Agent Orange Poisons New Generations in Vietnam
- U.S. Companies Shut Out as Iraq Auctions Its Oil Fields
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- The Danger of Doing Business in Russia
- Can Asia's Gambling Industry Continue to Thrive?
- The Goldman Controversy: Memories of Elián González
- How Las Vegas' Opulent CityCenter Survived Dubai
- The Reasons Behind Big Oil Declining Iraq's Riches
- Snow Job for the Avatar Opening?
- Agent Orange Poisons New Generations in Vietnam
- U.S. Companies Shut Out as Iraq Auctions Its Oil Fields
- Study: TV May Perpetuate Race Bias
- The Danger of Doing Business in Russia
- Joe Klein's Annual Teddy Awards
- Autism Numbers Are Rising. The Question is Why?
- The Goldman Controversy: Memories of Elián González
- Can Asia's Gambling Industry Continue to Thrive?
- How Las Vegas' Opulent CityCenter Survived Dubai
- Detroit's Last White City Council Member





RSS