Foreign News: Lausanne Treaty
(2 of 2)
In separate conventions the Allied demands were whittled down. These included: settlement of the Ottoman debt by apportionment among ex-Ottoman territories; regulation of concessions; settlement of the Mosul (Oil) Question; conclusion of separate judicial treaties granting right of complaint to foreign legal advisers in place of capitulations. The U. S. and Turkey signed a parallel, but separate, treaty of amity and commerce.
In effect, the Lausanne Settlement turned Europe bag and baggage out of Turkey instead of turning Turkey bag and baggage out of Europe. It signified the complete shipwreck of Lloyd George's five years' nursing of Greek ambitions. Flouting the conservative policy of seven decades, it exposed Turkey to intrigue and direct military pressure from Britain's perennial foe, Russia. It excluded France, Italy and Great Britain from exploitation of the spoils of war. It practically abandoned all pretence on the part of the Great Powers to protect the Christians in Turkey, cardinal point of Gladstone's eastern policy. The terms of the Straits Convention reduced British opportunities to checkmate Russia or bring naval pressure to bear on Turkish ambitions, cardinal point of British naval-political strategy.
*In addition to criticism in the British Commons and in the French Chamber of Deputies (see Page 8), the Lausanne Treaty came under heavy fire in the U. S.
In a stormy three-hours discussion at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, Manhattan, James W. Gerard, former U. S. Ambassador to Germany, attacked the Treaty, contending that "Christian civilization was crucified at Lausanne and the Stars and Stripes were trailed in the mire in the interest of a group of oil speculators." He characterized the Turks as murderers and the Kemalist Government as a group of adventurers whose régime was on its last legs. His position received needed dignity from the support of Professor A. D. F. Hamlin of Columbia University and Prof. Albert Bushnell Hart of Harvard, who wrote a letter saying that the Treaty was worthless and the Turks untrustworthy.
Feeling ran so high that blows impended on several occasions when the Turks and their Treaty were defended by Prof. Edward Meade Earle of Columbia, Dr. James J. Barton, Secretary of the Foreign Department of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, and the Rev. Albert W. Staub, American Director of Near East colleges.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- Stresses at Fort Hood Were Likely Intense for Hasan
- China Woos Africa And Not Just For Its Resources
- Priests Spar Over What it Means to Be Catholic
- The Meaning of Manny Pacquiao
- Brazil Student Expelled for Mini-Dress
- Hasan's Therapy: Could "Secondary Trauma" Have Driven Him to Shooting?
- A Christmas Carol Wins And Loses the Weekend
- Why We Look at Some Web Ads and Not Others
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Why We Look at Some Web Ads and Not Others
- China Woos Africa And Not Just For Its Resources
- Priests Spar Over What it Means to Be Catholic
- I Can Has Swine Flu? A Cat Comes Down with H1N1
- The Meaning of Manny Pacquiao
- Let's Bail Out the Pot Dealers!
- Stresses at Fort Hood Were Likely Intense for Hasan
- Why California is Still America’s Future
- Room Service and a Shovel: The Rise of Voluntourism







RSS