|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
National Affairs: Transfer Talk
It was no pleasure last week for Secretary of the Treasury Andrew William Mellon to drive to the Capitol and recommend, before the House Committee on Executive Expenditures, the transfer of Prohibition enforcement from his department to the Department of Justice. What was painful to him was not the prospect of parting with Prohibitionhe had had nine years of itbut the instinctive discomfort of a shy man appearing before a Congressional committee on a controversial question.
Thirty minutes later as he drove down Capitol Hill he was feeling very much better because he had not only talked transfer effectively but, more important, had successfully withstood the hectoring of Wets who sought to evoke his personal opinion on Prohibition.
Carefully Mr. Mellon sat down in the witness chair, at his elbow Assistant Secretary Lowman, behind him Prohibition Commissioner James Maurice Doran. Before the Committee was the enforcement transfer bill written by Dry Representative William Williamson of Rapid City, S. Dak. (Coolidge 1927 summer resort), homesteader, rural editor, lawyer, title abstractor. Major issue of the transfer is: where to put industrial alcohol control? The Williamson bill weasles this question, provides for joint control by the Treasury and Justice Departments.
Secretary Mellon put down his small thin cigar, unfolded a paper, read in a small voice:
". . . Placing Prohibition enforcement in the [Treasury's] Bureau of Internal Revenue was an illogical choice. . . . Prohibition is unrelated to the duties of the Treasury Department. . . . There is no reason why the Treasury should issue permits for the manufacture of industrial alcohol. It is equally clear that these duties do not fall within the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. . . . [But] since they are now being performed by the Treasury, there is no adequate reason for removing them, unless it can be shown that they logically belong elsewhere. . . . I recommend the enactment of the proposed legislation."
Mr. Mellon picked up his tiny cigar, puffed it nervously. He would have liked to depart at that point. But Congressmen do not often get a chance to cross-question the Secretary of the Treasury and when they do they make the most of it.
Question: Was the Bureau of Prohibition under your direction efficient?
Mellon: It doesn't seem to me to be a question of efficiency. It is a question of legislation before us.
Question: Do you think your bureau did everything possible to enforce the law?
Mellon: We have made every effort to carry out our responsibility.
Question: Do you believe, then, the Prohibition Law can be enforced?
Mellon: Prohibition is a very controversial subject. It is not a matter of my personal opinion at all.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Sherlock Holmes: Impressive Abs, Unmemorable Action
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- Has the Alleged Fort Hood Gunman's Imam Been Silenced?
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- China's Christmas Warning to Political Dissidents
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Mexico City's Revolutionary First: Gay Marriage
- China's Christmas Warning to Political Dissidents
- Sherlock Holmes: Impressive Abs, Unmemorable Action
- Has the Alleged Fort Hood Gunman's Imam Been Silenced?
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Obama, a Favorite Son, Will Perk Up Hawaii's Holidays
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'





RSS