- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
THE LEAGUE: Twelfth Assembly
The grave delegates to the League of Nations Assembly emerged from their hotels in Geneva last week and took their seats in the draughty Secretariat building for the League's twelfth annual session. Neatly printed on all of their desks was a list of 22 matters which they must consider in the next few weeks. These matters included:
No. 4—Progressive codification of international law.
No. 6—Amendments to the covenant in order to bring it into harmony with the Kellogg Pact.
No. 9—A request for the League's help in the international reform of penal administration.
No. 14—Annual world report on slavery.
No. 15—The nationality of women married to foreigners.
No. 22—Work of the international cinematograph institute at Rome.
The most important thing the League delegates did last week was not on the list at all. Mexico was admitted to membership.
The distinction of membership in the League of Nations costs a country's treasury anywhere from $45,000 a year (for little nations like Costa Rica or Liberia) to $450,000 a year (Britain, France and other great powers). Five years ago frugal Costa Rica decided that even $45,000 was more than a League membership was worth, withdrew in a huff when she was dunned for nonpayment of dues. Mexico thought it was worth while. Fat Foreign Minister Genaro Estrada, who surprised his friends last year by marrying a Mexico City socialite, cabled formal acceptance to President of the Assembly Nicolas Titulesco. The message contained a carefully wrapped lemon for the U. S.:
". . . In reply I inform you that Mexico has been absent from your high organization due to causes apart from any lack of the spirit of cooperation and immediately accepts the reparation you offer.* She therefore accepts membership in the League on the terms you announce, and offers a loyal spirit of friendship. . . .
"Mexico considers it necessary to accompany her act of acceptance with the declaration that she has never 'admitted the regional understanding mentioned in Article XXI of the League covenant."
Article XXI specifies that "regional understandings" shall not be affected by the League covenant. The regional understanding that Mexico was not admitting is, of course, the Monroe Doctrine, distasteful to proud Latin Americans because of its implication that Latin American countries are not capable of guarding their own interests from European aggression. Washington was not particularly soured by Minister Estrada's lemon. From the State Department came an unofficial statement that no matter how Mexico feels about it, the Monroe Doctrine will remain in effect.
After the admission of Mexico there were speeches. Three were important. Dino Grandi, Italy's black-fringed young Foreign Minister, stood up and proposed "that all nations should reach an immediate general agreement with a view to arriving at the suspension of the execution of their new armament programs," at least until the end of the approaching dis armament conference in February. German delegates applauded wildly, but other wise, like most suggestions that the League members should actually do something, the speech was greeted with shocked silence.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Another Snowstorm: What Happened to Global Warming?
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Counterterrorism: The Debate Moves Right
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- In Tokyo, Embattled Toyota Chief Faces a Nation
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Another Snowstorm: What Happened to Global Warming?
- Who Were the First Americans?
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- How to Build Your Own Bedbug Detector
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- How German Homeschoolers Won Asylum in the U.S.
- EMI's Downfall: Will the Hits Keep Coming?
- In Marriage, Worse First Can Mean Better Later





RSS