A New Marriage Proposal

Els

ewhere in America, a family therapist, a pastor or a wise grandparent might perform Karen Faverey's job. But in Delaware Terrace, a rambling brick housing project in the Rust Belt town of Easton, Pa., Faverey, a serene mother of six, is paid by the Federal Government to enter the living rooms of unwed, low-income couples and ask a loaded question. "You know which question I'm talking about," Faverey says to Lamont Sims and Stephanie Bryant, who live and work in Delaware Terrace, he in the maintenance department, she as a receptionist. They have dated for 2 1/2 years. Sims, 31, nods. "Lately, I'm discussing it on my own, 'cause I don't know what page she's on," he says. Resting his chin in his hand, Sims turns to Bryant, 30, who cradles their infant son, Stephan, in her arms. "How," he asks, "do you feel about marriage?"

He's not the only one asking. While academics of all political stripes agree that children are better off in stable, two-parent homes, how active a role government should play in fostering marriage is a matter of debate. Faverey assists a Healthy Relationships and Marriage Education course, a pilot program funded by President Bush's Healthy Marriage Initiative. The Administration sees marriage education as a tonic for poverty and other societal problems, particularly when children are involved. In the welfare reauthorization bill now pending in the Senate, the White House has asked Congress to spend $1.5 billion on such programs — a bold request in a time of huge budget deficits, a fervid national debate over the very meaning of marriage and uncertainty over the effectiveness of marriage-education policies.

LATEST COVER STORY Mind & Body Happiness Jan. 17, 2004 Past Issues Tsunami Jan. 10, 2004 ----------------- Person of the Year Jan. 3, 2004 ----------------- Secrets of the Nativity Dec. 13, 2004 ----------------- The Stealth Killer Dec. 6, 2004 ----------------- Coolest Inventions Nov. 29, 2004 ----------------- Battle for Fallujah Nov. 22, 2004 ----------------- Four More Years Nov. 15, 2004 ----------------- The Joy Of Sox Nov. 8, 2004 ----------------- The Morning After Nov. 1, 2004 ----------------- The God Gene Oct. 25, 2004 ----------------- The Vote Battle Oct. 18, 2004 ----------------- Visions of Tomorrow Oct. 11, 2004 ----------------- The Tragedy of Sudan Oct. 4, 2004 ----------------- CBS Controversy Sept. 27, 2004 ----------------- America's Border Sept. 20, 2004 ----------------- Struggle Within Islam Sept. 13, 2004 ----------------- World of George Bush Sept. 6, 2004 -----------------   SPECIAL REPORTS  Coolest Video Games 2004  Coolest Inventions  Wireless Society  Cool Tech 2004 PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS  At The Epicenter  Paths to Pleasure  Quotes of the Week  This Week's Gadget  Cartoons of the Week More graphics >> More photos >> MORE STORIES Advisor: Rove Warrior The Bushes: Family Dynasty Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency More Stories >> CNN.com: Latest News

Critics worry that money spent on these programs will divert resources from other worthy antipoverty efforts such as child welfare and refugee resettlement or that marriage educators could unwittingly pressure women to stay in abusive relationships. The National Organization for Women's Legal Defense and Education Fund, recently renamed Legal Momentum, charged that the course Sims and Bryant attended specifically emphasized job services for men but mentioned nothing about finding work for mothers. "We were shocked that one of the programs being funded would reinforce existing stereotypes about men and women, advocating a passive role for women," says Jennifer Brown, Legal Momentum's vice president. "Women in poverty need their own jobs to lift their families out." The group filed a sex-discrimination complaint with the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

But mainly, liberals and libertarians argue that marriage is a private decision and that, as Brown says,"There are some issues that just should not involve government." Wade Horn, Assistant Secretary for Children and Families at HHS, points out that marriages are already subject to state and federal meddling — especially when they dissolve. "You want government intrusion in family life?" Horn asks. "Get divorced. The government will tell you when you see your kid, how much you pay in child support. It can even garnishee your wages." The Healthy Marriage Initiative, Horn says, should ultimately result in less government oversight, largely because "children who grow up in healthy and stable families have less need for social services."

The 35 couples who have taken the 12-week Pennsylvania course since it was launched in July 2003 would probably line up on the side of getting all the help they can get. The classes are run by Community Services for Children (CSC), a nonprofit organization that oversees Head Start programs in Allentown, Pa. On Monday nights, couples convene at a Boys & Girls Club, dropping off their children with caregivers provided by the program. The moms and dads share canned soda and free dinners such as chicken, potatoes and gravy before the two instructors — Gregory Edwards, author of the program's curriculum, and a female social worker — lead discussions on finances, household chores and parenting. Faverey, a mentor for Head Start families who is trained in relationship and child-development issues, follows up by visiting each couple at home once a week. She helps them create and follow a "relationship road map"--a list of goals like buying a home or marrying within two years, and the efforts taken to achieve them. Such techniques would be useful for any couple, but there are also parts of the program specific to its target audience. Halfway through the course, for example, Edwards introduces a subject likely to go uncovered at the typical $200 weekend marriage seminar attended by middle-class couples. "When I say paternity, what comes to mind?" he asks. "Blood test," says one man. "Knowing that your child is yours," volunteers another.