|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
THE GOVERNMENT: New Experiment
To most Congressmen the pleasure of putting thumb to nose and waving all four fingers in the direction of Franklin Delano Roosevelt was last week a fully satisfying occupation (see p. 12). But to Congress' thoughtful fringe (New Deal and anti-New Deal) there was a far more interesting occupation, the same occupation as that of many a businessman, trying to answer a question:
After the defeat of the Spend-Lend Bill and other New Deal measures, what will be the state of business at convention time next year?
Either the U. S. cannot prosper with Government spending or it cannot prosper without Government spending, according to the contending factions. The new experiment of which Congress, not the New Deal, is the author, is to see whether the U. S. can get along on a lot less spending.
Anti-New Dealers predicted and hoped that with Roosevelt on the run, and Government spending on the way out, private capital would go back to work, would more than make up investment-wise for the $3,000,000,000-odd of new Government money which the New Deal has pumped into the U. S. economy each year. Their hopes were raised when smiling, soft-spoken Acting Secretary of the Treasury John Hanes announced last week that business was doing fine, ". . . We are on the eve of what may be a real forward movement."
New Dealers concentrated on gloomy calculations for the crucial second quarter of 1940. They figured on sharp cuts in spending: that WPA under new appropriations would be nearly $250,000,000 under April-June 1939, that PWA outlay, now around $150,000,000 a quarter, would sink to nothing by next spring. In the first half of 1939, although business in general was not booming, nonresidential construction hit a recovery high that exceeded even 1937. For this Government spending was responsible as the figures for contracts let show:
1937 1939 Private
construction $ 758,948,000 $ 450,178,000
Public
construction 790,522,000 1,335,993,000
Total $1,549,470,000 $1,786,171,000
Believing that Government spending (for new public works, railroad equipment and housing, etc.) is necessary to tide over steel and other durable goods industries the summer and autumn of 1940, New Dealers now count on sagging indices. They asked whether Congress could revive (noted Barren's Index on building stocks was down 7.66% from July 28) July's stockmarket boom.
Today Government spending exceeds Government revenues by about $1,000,000,000 a quarter. By next spring the Government's deficit spending will probably be down to $600,000,000 a quarter. New Dealers, certain of a slump, were last week in a mood to let events take their course in order to tell Congress afterwards "I told you so." If there is no slump-the shoe will be on the other foot. Rather than sit back and tell the country to watch Congress ruin it, New Dealers may yet decide to go their own way and claim credit for saving business from the fate to which they claim Congress has doomed it.
If they take this alternative, they can:
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- The Stolen E-Mails: Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Five Flawed Assumptions of Obama's Afghan Surge
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- Jerusalem: A Growing Powder Keg in Mideast
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?
- The Stolen E-Mails: Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Max Baucus and His Women
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Astronomers Spy a New Planet-Like Object
- Morales' Big Win: Voters Ratify His Remaking of Bolivia
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?





RSS