- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
AIR: Certain Death
Last week, somewhere in the Pacific, two U. S. naval planes collided. Six men died. At Opa Locka, Fla., a naval training plane fell out of control, the pilot's parachute did not open, and he was killed. An Army Air Corps lieutenant crashed, fatally, in the Panama Canal Zone. An Army fighter crashed near Mitchel Field, L. I., another Army plane had a forced landing near Buffalo. The pilots of both planes survived.
In the Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics, at Army Air Corps headquarters in Washington, men marked down these crashes, these deaths. The inevitable was happening: as more & more planes and pilots took the air, the average rate (per 1,000 hours flown) of crashes and fatalities was going up. The press noted the increase with alarm, assumed that something was wrong, taxed the Army and Navy with the blame. Last fortnight the Air Corps's veteran Brigadier General Herbert A. Dargue called in a picked group of correspondents, told them to expect more crashes, more deaths. Last week the War Department made his information public.
General Dargue has been flying since 1913. He pioneered Army use of hydroplanes that year, led a famous flight around South America (Dec. 21, 1926-May 2, 1927), at 54 is still flying hot ships. He explained that better planes, training, supervision had steadily cut the Air Corps accident rateuntil lately. In 1921 there was a death for approximately every 1,000 flying hours; in 1940 only one for every 10,000 hours. From July 1, 1939 to June 30, 1940 the Air Corps had 88 deaths in 46 crashes. From last July 1 to Dec. 1, there were 85 deaths; in January, 19; in February, 28. The rate was rising. And, said General Dargue with sad certainty, it would continue to rise: the country could expect as many as 150 more young men to die in Army crashes by June's end.
Anyone could understand that the total of deaths was bound to increase (plans to train 30,000 Army pilots a year were revealed last week). But how about the rate? General Dargue could explain that, too. Lowest rate (one death per 40,000 flying hours) was still among students at the Air Corps schools, where close supervision kept fatalities and injuries down. But even there the proportion of thoroughly experienced instructors was bound to drop, as the number of students increased. The course had been shortened from a year to seven and a half months. Graduated cadets necessarily went out to their units with less training than their predecessors had before the great expansion started. And the first 750 flying hours, when heady youngsters went into faster and heavier ships, were always the hardest, resulted in three times more accidents than the next 1,250 hours. Said General Dargue: "As long as the human element is the human element there will be accidents. When an emergency makes it necessary to train men rapidly, the experience curve will temporarily drop, the accident curve rise. It is regrettable, but there is nothing which can replace experience."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Counterterrorism: The Debate Moves Right
- In Tokyo, Embattled Toyota Chief Faces a Nation
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- Another Snowstorm: What Happened to Global Warming?
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- Another Snowstorm: What Happened to Global Warming?
- U.S.-China Friction: Why Neither Side Can Afford a Split
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- Obesity in Kids: Three Lifestyle Changes that Help
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- In Marriage, Worse First Can Mean Better Later





RSS