Letters
(4 of 4)
"What Saddam Was Really Thinking" [Oct. 18], on the disclosures made in Charles Duelfer's CIA report on Iraq's alleged weapons arsenal, posed a head scratcher. You reported that Iraqi military morale sank when Saddam informed his senior officers that they would have to fight the coalition without biological, chemical or nuclear weapons. But the story also said that "military officers lied about their preparedness," which led Saddam to miscalculate Iraq's ability to deter an invasion. Was Saddam the duper or the duped?
ERMES CULOS
Ashcroft, B.C.
I am thankful to President Bush because he had the courage to make the decision to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq. Saddam Hussein was a problem not only for Iraq but for other countries as well. The American and British invasion has broken the rule of this dictator. Although the situation in Iraq is very difficult and dangerous, the coalition has no choice but to remain until there is no further threat from the insurgents.
LUIGI GIANOLA
Como, Italy
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Most Popular »
- The Man Behind Russia's Deadly Train Blast
- The Pakistani Taliban's War on Schoolchildren
- The End of Audacity
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The Toughest Diet
- China vs. Disney: The Battle for Mulan
- World's Most Shocking Apology: Oprah to James Frey
- Afghanistan: Can Obama Sell America on This War?
- Why the Loan-Modification Program Isn't Working
- How Tiger Woods Can Survive the Scandal
- Where China Goes Next
- World's Most Shocking Apology: Oprah to James Frey
- Man Of The Year: John F. Kennedy, A Way with the People
- Hong Kong: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Where's the Beef? Ghent Goes Vegetarian
- Oprah vs. James Frey: The Sequel
- A Brush with Gauguin
- How Safe Are Vaccines?
- A New Fight to Legalize Euthanasia
- Is There Really a Credit Crunch?





RSS