UNITED NATIONS: Into the Open
The creeping crisis in Greece last week (see FOREIGN NEWS) threw its reflection across the Security Council table at Lake Success. Those who asked "How much good is U.N. in a showdown?" might soon have an answer. Russia's Gromyko had vetoed the mild U.S. resolution to set up a two-year border watch there. He threatened now to veto every other scheme the Council could invent to fasten the blame where it belongedon Greece's Sovietsupported Balkan neighbors. What, then, could U.N. do?
Said U.S. Delegate Herschel Vespasian Johnson in the Security Council last week: "Greece's right to exist is involved. . . . The continued failure of the Security Council to take effective action in this case because of the Soviet veto cannot . . . preclude individual or collective action by states willing to act. . . ."
Grimly, Johnson said that the U.S. was ready, if the Russians continued to deadlock the Council, to throw the whole case into the 55-nation U.N. General Assembly this September. There, unhampered by the veto, the majority of nations might pronounce an overwhelming moral judgment which would support U.S. aid to Greece. With such a mandate, said Johnson, the U.S. and "like-minded members of the United Nations" could join "in taking any steps which might become necessary . . . to afford Greece the protection to which she is entitled under the Charter."
This step might become one of the most significant landmarks in U.N.'s constitutional development. If Russian abuse of the veto could be countered through Assembly action sanctioning peace-enforcement by individual states, then U.N. would have made a long step toward world government. Would the U.S.S.R. stay in a U.N. which could be used to oppose Russian policy as long as the U.S. had a majority in the Assembly? And was the U.S., which at San Francisco had favored the Big Power veto, really ready to submit all future security cases to the will of the majority of nations? These questions had always been implicit in the Charter; the Greek case was forcing these basic issues into the open.
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- One Year After the Mumbai Massacre, a Trial Plods on
- Ahmadinejad in Brazil: Why Lula Defies the U.S.
- In His Cave, a Palestinian Farmer Makes a Stand
- Me and Orson Welles: Zac Efron Takes the Stage
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Dark Side of Darwin's Legacy
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Think Big with an African Ocean Safari
- In His Cave, a Palestinian Farmer Makes a Stand
- Ahmadinejad in Brazil: Why Lula Defies the U.S.







RSS