National Affairs: Primary Problems
As he painstakingly formulated his political plans over the past summer, Adlai Stevenson figured that he would have little serious Democratic opposition to his bid for the chance to face Dwight Eisenhower next year. Stevenson laid out his schedule accordingly: he would announce his candidacy in November and immediately begin concentrating on the campaign for the 1956 general election. He figured, as did most political observers, that he could carry the convention without having to dissipate his energy in the various state presidential primaries.
The plan made eminently good sense until the moment that President Eisen hower's illness vastly increased the value of the Democratic nomination. Stevenson is still miles in front of any other candidate, and his nomination might be considered in the bag except for the troublesome tactical problem of the party primaries. On how to handle this, Stevenson has been getting conflicting advice. A fast-dwindling group of Stevenson followers argues that he is already so far ahead that he would be taking a needless risk by entering any primaries. A second group insists that Stevenson can prove himself the strongest Democratic candidate by entering a few important but carefully selected primaries.
Still another groupwhich includes Chicago's influential Mayor Richard Daleythinks that Stevenson should enter all the primariesor almost allthereby avoiding charges that he is afraid to submit himself to the voters.
One In, One Out. In balancing the possibilities, Stevenson must consider the situation of his two most obvious rivals for the nomination: Tennessee's Senator Estes Kefauver and New York's Governor Averell Harriman.
Kefauver, who has left little doubt that he will run since returning from his two-month world tour, is unpopular with most of the big-city Democratic organization leaders and with many Southern leaders. He therefore has little choice but to throw himself into the primaries. In 1952 handshaking Estes Kefauver built up a great reputation as a primary campaignera reputation that haunts Stevenson's followers when they realize that losses to Kefauver in important primaries might kill Stevenson's chances. Almost forgotten is the fact that Kefauver's 1952 primary victories came almost entirely against minor opposition. In New Hampshire he beat a Harry Truman who did not campaign and who scoffed at presidential primaries as "eyewash." In Oregon Kefauver won with Stevenson's and Supreme Court Justice William Douglas' names on the ballot against himbut they had been placed there against their wishes, and neither campaigned. Only in Nebraska, against Oklahoma's Senator Robert Kerr, did Kefauver defeat a name candidate who was actively campaigning.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- World Leaders Put Off a Climate Change Treaty
- The Prisoner Review: A Pretentious Reimagining
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Box Office Weekend: 2012 Masters Disaster
- Does Mexico City Need a Red-Light District?
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- YouTube Effect: Making Money From Viral Videos
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- Beijing: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Armed Forces: The Men in the Green Berets
- In a Malaria Hot Spot, Resistance to a Key Drug
- Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense
- How to Crack Japan: The Big Bang Theory
- Hip Berlin: Europe's Capital of Cool
- Mother Teresa's Crisis of Faith







RSS