THE SUPREME COURT: Without Limitation
In the first formal test of the 1953 Submerged Lands Act, the U.S. Supreme Court this week denied Rhode Island and Alabama permission to file suits contesting the right of Congress to give seaboard states the land under U.S. coastal waters (tidelands). In an unsigned opinion, by a vote of 6-2 (Justices Hugo Black and William Douglas dissented; Chief Justice Earl Warren disqualified himself), the high court held that "the power over the public land . . . entrusted to Congress is without limitation."
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Toilets
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- Talking with the Taliban: Easier Said Than Done
- Is This the End of the Line for Saab?
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Singh in Washington: Making the Case for India
- The Trouble With Abortion and Healthcare Reform
- Reburying Albert Camus: A Political Ploy by Sarkozy?
- It's Twilight in America: The Vampire Saga
- The Grass-Roots Abortion War
- The Flu Vaccine
- Q&A: Robert Pattinson
- Plagiarism Software Finds a New Shakespeare Play
- Can Vitamin D Protect Against Breast Cancer?
Quotes of the Day »
MANOJ, a police officer stationed in Mumbai, on why he and other police don't criticize their leaders for failing to meet promises to improve dire working conditions after last fall's deadly attacks on the Taj hotel







RSS