OPINION: Brotherly Blow
Despite Red Baiter Joe McCarthy's chip-on-the-shoulder attitude toward the Administration, President Eisenhower has treated him impersonally and with restraint, even when indicating disapproval of McCarthy's methods. But the President's eldest brother, Kansas City Banker Arthur Eisenhower, 66, made no attempt to stifle his indignation when he was asked his opinion of McCarthy in Las Vegas last week. Joe, said Arthur Eisenhower firmly, is "the most dangerous menace to America."
He did not stop there. "When I think of McCarthy," he told a reporter from the New Dealish Las Vegas Sun, after arriving to attend a meeting of T.W.A. directors, "I automatically think of Hitler. I would believe anything about him, and I think your paper and its publisher, Hank Greenspun, should be commended on the stand it has taken against this rabble-rouser . . . It's a shame that McCarthy is a member of the G.O.P., because he has done the Republican Party no good."
Asked if he thought McCarthy had an "ultimate objective," Arthur Eisenhower said: "Of course he has. He wants to keep his name in the papers at all costs. He follows the old political game, which is, 'whose name is mentioned the most in politics is often selected for the highest office.'
"He is a throwback to the Spanish Inquisition. He calls in people and proceeds to make fools of them by twisting their answers . . . They have no rebuttal because they have no recourse to the press, radio and magazines. It is Nazi-like, and what makes it all so much more of a fiasco is that he has never been responsible for the conviction of oneof one, mind youCommunist."
When the word got to Washington, McCarthy "demanded" that Banker Eisenhower confirm or deny the Sun story, and generally acted as though he thought Editor Greenspun (one of his bitterest.critics) had made it all up. Arthur Eisenhower obliged. Interviewed at Phoenix on his way home, he said: "Sure I called him the most dangerous menace to America, but I don't understand why the remark caused excitement." Back home in Kansas City, he was asked if his statement reflected the viewpoint of the President. "That's the hell of it," he said unhappily. "People misinterpret things. I want," he added belatedly, "to keep out of controversial subjects."
The White House had no comment.
Most Popular »
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company







RSS