|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Science: The Fate of Yoke Peter
(2 of 2)
Flaming Spin. The first small crack was enough; air pressure (more than half a ton per square foot) did the rest. The cabin exploded like a bursting balloon; its top flew off; its tail and nose broke away. The wings broke in two, releasing floods of fuel, which ignited. Then the gutted fuselage with its two stub wings dived flaming to the sea in an inverted spin.
To check this theory, Farnborough built 100 small wooden models of the Comet, with parts designed to come apart. They were dropped from balloons or from the top of a hangar. At last one of them broke up in just the way that Yoke Peter did. Its center section spun down to the ground, where its fragments were distributed on the ground in the same pattern that the fragments of Yoke Peter had made on the bottom of the Mediterranean.
Still not satisfied, the Farnborough men constructed a large model of a Comet's cabin in transparent plastic. They filled it with model seats and model passengers. They pumped it full of air at 8¼ lbs. Then they deliberately fractured the skin near the direction-finder window and took a motion picture of what happened.
In one-thirtieth of a second three of the forward seats, one of them with a passenger, moved upward toward the break in the roof. The next row of seats followed close behind. As the "suction wave" raced down the cabin, passengers and seats flew out into space. In two seconds, the scientists figured, the cabin of Yoke Peter must have been empty.
This checked gruesomely with the autopsies performed on the bodies recovered from the sea. Most of them had skull fractures and external wounds. "Explosive decompression" (from pressurized to thin air) had burst all their lungs and hearts.
The De Havilland Aircraft Co., builders of the Comets, could not have been happy to hear the results of the inquiry, which placed the blame for the crashes on faulty design and manufacturing methods. But Britain's aircraft industry might well be proud of the inquiry's utter frankness. Its designers are already using the Farnborough testing methods to make sure that such disasters will not happen again.
* Failure of a metal after repeated straining. Small cracks, which sometimes start at tool marks, sharp indentations or other "stress raisers," spread through metal until it breaks. Sufficient strength, correct design and careful fabrication can prevent such failures.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Why Obama Has to Worry About Polls
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Will Your Next Car be Made in India?
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- In Cleveland, Worker Co-Ops Look to a Spanish Model
- Dear President Obama: What North Korea Might Say
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- Top Stocks of the Decade
- Made in India: The $12,000 Electric Car
- Rage Against Simon Cowell? A British Pop Charts Upset
- In Cleveland, Worker Co-Ops Look to a Spanish Model
- Why Obama Has to Worry About Polls
- Dear President Obama: What North Korea Might Say
- Will Your Next Car be Made in India?
- Top Stocks of the Decade
- Agent Orange Poisons New Generations in Vietnam
- Forcing Insurers to Spend Enough on Health Care
- Have Yourself a Sandinista Christmas...
- The Importance of Economic Equality
- Despite Aid, Yemen Faces Growing Al-Qaeda Threat





RSS