THE ELECTION: An Old Combination
Happy days, as Franklin Roosevelt's theme song went, were here again. And they got here again in a way that F.D.R. could well have appreciated: a Democratic candidate, partly by force of personality, partly by piecing back together the power blocs that had been shattered by Republican Dwight Eisenhower, was the U.S.'s President-elect.
Democrat Jack Kennedy won by 1) rolling up huge pluralities in the big cities of the states that counted most, and 2) by holding on to most of the restive but still Democratic South.
Big-City Trend. One by one, the U.S.'s major cities gave Kennedy votes enough to assure victory in key states. Time after time, Richard Nixon inched back in nonmetropolitan areasbut rarely by enough. By pre-election estimates, Philadelphia had to go to Kennedy by at least 200,000 for him to win in Pennsylvania; the city went by 326,000. Although Nixon won 52 of Pennsylvania's 67 counties, the state went down the drain for the Republicans. Kennedy carried New York City with 63% of the vote, far more than enough to take New York State's 45 electoral votes. Nixon ran well in outstate Michiganbut Kennedy grabbed a big lead in Detroit and held on. It was Los Angelesalways considered Nixon's strongholdthat gave Kennedy California.
In states where the metropolitan trend was either slowed or reversed, the results proved how much Kennedy depended on the city vote. New Jersey had been figured as a landslide for Kennedylargely on the basis of a pre-election estimate of at least a 100,000 Kennedy plurality in Jersey City. But the Hudson County machine fell down on the joband Kennedy had the scare of his life. Again, Ohio was figured as a Kennedy cinchbut Cleveland fell short of its expected Democratic plurality, and the state went to Nixon.
What happened in the cities to give Kennedy his vast advantage? In many ways it was a reversion to voting habits temporarily obliterated by the personal popularity of Dwight Eisenhower. As in Roosevelt's day, ethnic, racial and religious minorities once again voted heavily Democratic. It was also in the cities that Kennedy's personality caught on most decisively. There were strong indications that Eisenhower, had he started campaigning three weeks before Election Day, might have stemmed the tide: his Cleveland appearance was almost certainly a major factor in saving Ohio for Nixon.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- Florida Grapples With Its Deadly Hit-and-Run Car Culture
- Germany's Doubts About Afghanistan Grow After Revelations About Air Strike
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- How Guatemala's Most Beautiful Lake Turned Ugly
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power







RSS