|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
U.S. Business: Settling an Account
(2 of 2)
Struck Down. The trustbusters hold the upper hand. In decisions that set the precedent for Judge MacMahon's ruling, the Supreme Court ruled in 1963 that the proposed merger of two Philadelphia banks was illegal, and last year it struck down a Lexington (Ky.) bank merger. If the Supreme Court continues in this pattern, more federal judges may be emboldened to back the trustbusters' complaints in the lower courts. The Justice Department is now arguing suits against Milwaukee and Chicago bank mergers, is expected to file another against a San Francisco bank. It is also watching other mergers that it feels might lessen competition among banks, which it ranks as "perhaps more vital than in any other area."
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Brazilian Family Concedes Defeat: Sean Goldman Home by Christmas?
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Why Obama Has to Worry About Polls
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Christmas Shopping: For Retailers, Down to Two Crucial Days
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Holland's Plan to Tax Every Kilometer Driven
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- Rehabilitating Joseph Stalin
- Domestic Terror Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009
- Brazilian Family Concedes Defeat: Sean Goldman Home by Christmas?
- A Pariah No More: Serbia Bids to Join the E.U.
- Will Your Next Car be Made in India?
- Tapping Into India's Growing Alcohol Market





RSS