The Economy: Effects of TheTax Hike
THE ECONOMY
The outlines of the deal had been clear for some weeks. In exchange for the tax increase that he believes essential to save the economy from inflationary chaos, Lyndon Johnson would submit to massive budget cuts, despite pressing domestic needs. Last week when the package finally came to a vote, the House passed it by a surprisingly comfortable margin of 268 to 150, and only 16½ hours later the Senate, by an even cushier 64-to-16 vote, rushed the measure to the White House, where it awaited certain approval.
What effect it will have on the economy is less sure. At best, it will ease inflationary pressures. But there is also a danger that the combined restraint of higher taxes and reduced spending will prove too powerful a brake, throttling expansion rather than merely controlling it.
Up, Up & Away. The tax increase was long overdue. Johnson requested a 6% surcharge on personal and corporate income taxes as far back as his 1967 State of the Union address, then failed to press for it. Ten months ago he demanded a 10% increase, but a recalcitrant House coalition, led by Ways and Means Chairman Wilbur Mills, would not yield without parallel cutbacks in Government outlays. Meanwhile, consumer prices were advancing at an annual rate of 4%, more than twice the average of the early '60s. The gross national product was bubbling toward the $850 billion level, up some $65 billion from last year. Interest rates soared. On top of a $20 billion-plus federal-budget deficit in the fiscal year ending this month, the new year was expected to bring as much as $30 billion in red ink. So huge a deficit, in turn, threatened to reduce confidence in the already shaky dollar. His back to the wall, Johnson finally met Mills's price for a tax increase, and the influential chairman, together with the House Democratic and Republican leadership, combined to assemble a large majority for the bill.
The Bite. Most taxpayers will begin to feel the measure's impact by mid-July. Because the increase for individuals is retroactive only to April 1, the increased bite for 1968 will really amount to 7½% (example: the $10,000-a-year man with wife and two children who paid $1,100 in taxes last year will pay an added $83.25 in 1968). Corporations, liable for the increase as of last Jan. 1, will pay the full additional 10% in taxes. Though the surcharge is supposed to run to next June 30, nobody would be surprised if it were prolonged. In return for the surcharge and some relatively minor revenue measureswhich together will yield an estimated $15 billion in the next yearthe Administration reluctantly accepted a mandatory $6 billion spending cut by agreeing to a $180.1 billion limit on federal outlays in the new fiscal year.*
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- How Tiger Woods Can Survive the Scandal
- China vs. Disney: The Battle for Mulan
- Rachel Uchitel: Tiger Woods' Alleged Mistress
- Executive Privilege for Obama's Social Secretary?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- World's Most Shocking Apology: Oprah to James Frey
- Afghanistan: Can Obama Sell America on This War?
- The Man Behind Russia's Deadly Train Blast
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- What to Do About Europe's Secret Nukes
- Kids with ADHD May Learn Better by Fidgeting
- Essay: The Shoes of Imelda Marcos
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Advertisements for Themselves
- Born Gay?
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power
- World's Most Shocking Apology: Oprah to James Frey
- Having It Both Ways in Advertising
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- New York City: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours






RSS