Libel: Public Officials & Public Men
The U.S. ideal of unhampered public debate on public issues got an unprecedented boost in 1963 when the Supreme Court raised the First Amendment right of free speech as a shield against state libel laws. That shield, ruled the court in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, prevents a public official from collecting damages for even false criticism of his conduct, unless he proves that the statement was "made with 'actual malice'that is, with knowledge that it was false, or with reckless disregard of whether it was or not."
That decision placed a...
To read the entire article, you must be a TIME subscriber. Already registered? Sign in below
Current print subscribers to register
Subscribe now to get TIME All Access
Email, Password or Region is incorrect
A required form parameter was missing.
The System is currently down. Please try again in a few minutes.
Email Address is invalid
Password is blank
Most Popular »
- Your Turn, Canada: A Second-By-Second Look at Jeremy Lin Lighting Up Toronto
- Linsanity Heads East, Linfects China and Taiwan
- Love Ever After: A Valentine’s Day Special
- Can Jeremy Lin End The MSG/Time Warner Cable War?
- After Whitney Houston, Musicians Say: I'm Afraid
- Move Over, Pajama Jeans: Dress-Pant Sweatpants Have Arrived
- Top 10 Famous Love Letters
- Music: White Lies and The White Stripes
- Rick Santorum Wants to Fight 'The Dangers Of Contraception'
- Roving the Red Planet
- Beirut: Where Valentine's Day Belongs to Another Kind of Saint
- Europe's Deep Freeze: Why Climate Change Is Not (Entirely) to Blame
- Under Armour's Big Step Up
- Archaeology in Jerusalem: Digging Up Trouble
- The Power of Make-Believe
- Russian Kids in America: When The Adopted Can't Adapt
- What Happens When We Die?
- How Not to Raise a Bully: The Early Roots of Empathy
- Burning Desire For Freedom
- Friends With Benefits




