No Cheers, No Jeers
A President about to address a new Congress has a threefold problem: he must be firm but not insulting, must recommend without demanding, must be conciliatory but not abjectin short, he must present the best illustration possible of how the executive and legislative departments should work together in a democracy. When the President is of one party and the Congress of another, the problem is intensified.
As he prepared his State of the Union message, Harry Truman was well aware of this problem. For more than a month he had shunted aside most other business while he consulted secretaries, statisticians, counselors and Cabinet members about the speech. His amazing confidence was still unflagging;* White House aides predicted that it would turn out to be a good speech.
But this week, as, standing on the rostrum of the House, he delivered the fruit of all this husbandry to a joint session of Congress, it was clear that Harry Truman had been the victim of too much conferring, too much polishing, too much looking over his shoulder at his critics. By the time he was finished, it was apparent that he could have delivered his message in either the Union League Club or a union hall, without getting many cheers or jeers in either place.
Lick & Promise. To a nation which had demanded a change in policy he offered, scarcely any policy at all. Instead of specific remedies for the nation's problems, he produced mainly a vaguely worded collection of generalities which implicitly invited Congress to do as it pleased.
Some major matters he avoided completely. There was no mention of portal-to-portal pay, of income-tax reductions, of such an old troublemaker as FEPC. Foreign policy and foreign trade he dismissed with a lick & a promiseand an aside on "the difficulty of reaching agreement with the Soviet Union on the terms of [peace] settlement." One of his few specific requests was for the continuation of war excise tax rateswhich he himself had just lifted by abruptly announcing the termination of hostilities (see below). .
Labor was the hottest issue, and Harry Truman handled it with gloves. He asked for legislation to outlaw jurisdictional strikes and their secondary boycotts. Since even most labor leaders want the same thing, that was like coming out against sin. He wanted better federal mediation machinery to stop strikes, and increased social legislation to "alleviate the causes of workers' insecurity."
Friends of labor "could take comfort from some words: "We must not, in order to punish a few labor leaders, pass vindictive laws which will restrict the proper rights of the rank & file of labor." But his proposal that a joint congressional-presidential commission be set up to draft labor legislation was opening the door to another Case Billsince that is exactly what G.O.P. congressional members would demand.
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular
-
Most Read
- In Battleground Virginia, a Tale of Two Ground Games
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Is Barack Obama American Enough?
- For White Working Class, Obama Rises on Empty Wallets
- Is Cheaper Oil A Good Thing?
- Is Laser-Powered HDTV the Highest Def Yet?
- Palin's Blown Opportunity on Energy Independence
- Europeans Rush to Coordinate Meltdown Plan
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- One Financial Doomsayer Sees More Doom Ahead
-
Most Emailed
- Is Barack Obama American Enough?
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- The Financial Crisis: What Would the Talmud Do?
- In Battleground Virginia, a Tale of Two Ground Games
- A Family Divided by Obama and McCain
- One Financial Doomsayer Sees More Doom Ahead
- Just What the Economy Needs: A $5,000 Toilet
- For White Working Class, Obama Rises on Empty Wallets
- Palin's Blown Opportunity on Energy Independence
- Finding One Economic Bright Spot on Main Street
Mixx





RSS