FOREIGN RELATIONS: Report on Panmunjom
After flying back to the U.S. from Korea, rock-jawed Arthur Dean went on the radio last week to tell the nation about his meetings with the Communists in the famed straw hut at Panmunjom. Wall Street Lawyer Dean explained, first of all, why he broke off the talks. At the Dec. 12 meeting, after seven weeks of futile wrangling, the Red Chinese delegate charged that the U.S. was responsible for Syngman Rhee's release of 27,000 anti-Communist P.W.s last June." Said Dean to his radio audience: "I told the Chinese delegate that his statement was false, and that unless he withdrew the charge I would treat the meetings as in indefinite recess. He repeated the charge, and I walked out in protest."
All that the negotiators at Panmunjom were supposed to decide were the time, place and makeup of the political conference called for in the Korean armistice agreement. What, then, had they been arguing about for seven weeks? The makeup question. Dean explained, was "the meat of the coconut." The Communists demanded that neutrals, including the Soviet Union, be invited to attend the political conference as voting participants. Dean agreed that neutrals might attend, but insisted that 1) they should have no vote, and 2) the Soviet Union could not be counted as a neutral, though it could be seated as a non-neutral participant.
Dean indicated in his report that a resumption of talks with the Communists was possible. But he, held out little hope that any conference would lead to a free and independent Korea. The Chinese Communists, he said, "are determined to keep North Korea politically and economically integrated into their own economy."
Posing an ear-catching question, Dean asked: "If a political conference is not held, does that mean that hostilities will be resumed?" Answer: "No, it does not. The armistice agreement provides that it shall remain in effect until expressly superseded . . . Will the Communists resume hostilities? I do not think so. [They] took a terrific beating."
Was there any danger that Syngman Rhee might touch off a war on his own? Said Dean: "I am confident President Rhee will take no unilateral action."
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Toilets
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Talking with the Taliban: Easier Said Than Done
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- Is This the End of the Line for Saab?
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Singh in Washington: Making the Case for India
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Reburying Albert Camus: A Political Ploy by Sarkozy?
- Can an Execution Help Heal Bangladesh?
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- New Moon Review: Team Jacob Ascending
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Baby Einsteins: Not So Smart After All







RSS