Art: A Masterpiece in Disguise
Looking as if he wanted to break into a dance and a cheer, the Detroit Institute of Arts' Director Edgar P. Richardson peered through his rimless glasses at a press conference one day last week and announced: "I am about to tell the success story of a picture." What precise, soft-spoken Dr. Richardson had to tell was news indeed. The small (only 8 ¼-in. by 5 ¼in.) painting that the museum had bought in 1925 for $18,000 had at last been identified. Its painter: Jan van Eyck, one of the most highly valued Flemish artists. "There is no longer any question," said Richardson triumphantly. "It is the work of one hand only, and that one hand is Van Eyck's." Authentication of the paintingSt. Jerome in His Study, showing the 4th century scholar who made a new translation of the Bible into Latinis typical of the best of 20th century art sleuthing. The painting was known to be a puzzler when Detroit bought it.
Sections of the carefully detailed Gothic craftsmanship seemed like Van Eyck's work. But the red-brown robe was uninspired and dull, and the floor area was badly wrinkled.
Some 30 scholars debated the authorship of St.
Jerome before Dr. Erwin Panofsky of Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study discovered that the minuscule address on the letter on the table could be deciphered. The medieval writing was addressed to "The Cardinal Priest of the Holy Cross of Jerusalem." St. Jerome had no connection with that church, but Van Eyck's friend and patron, Niccolo Albergati, was made cardinal of the church in 1426.
The clinching evidence came last February when the painting was sent to Manhattan Art Restorer William Suhr for cleaning. He discovered that the panel had been heavily overpainted, the hat changed in shape, a cherry-red rosary made into a blue cord.
Underneath the robe was the original paint, heavily damaged, but identified by Richardson as "characteristic Van Eyck colora clear, deep crimson." As to the value of Detroit's find, one of 30-odd Van Eycks in existence, Richardson pointed out that Manhattan's Frick Collection paid a reported $750,000 for a Virgin and Child by Van Eyck and his follower, Petrus Christus. Already one dealer has offered Detroit $400,000 for its St. Jerome. But Director Richardson had a firm answer: the painting is not for sale.
Most Popular »
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Toilets
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Female Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Malady?







RSS