|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
MEXICO: Last of the Latitundios
In arid Sonora state, just south of the U.S. border, Mexico's Agriculture Minister Gilberto Flores Muñoz stood in the hot sun one day last week, read aloud a decree that expropriated a huge chunk of U.S. -owned property the 400,000-acre Cananea Ranch. As thousands of peasants, swirling on the dry. sandy earth, shouted "Sonora for the Sonorans!". he raised the Mexican flag over the last of the great Mexican latifundios (big estates) and took it from the family of Texan William C. Greene, which had owned it for 58 years. The Sonora Legislature declared a legal holiday and congratulatory wires flooded the desk of President Adolfo Ruiz Cortines. Exulted Mexico City's Universal: "Cananea is at last freed."
In expropriating Cananea, President Ruiz Cortines was only doing what every Mexican has expected of every Mexican president since 1911, when illiterate Revolutionary Emiliano Zapata cried "Land and Liberty!" In the first 18 years of the program six Presidents handed over 17½ million acres to landless peasants. Land Reformer Lazaro Cárdenas (1934-40) parceled out 45 million acres; Avila Camacho (1940-46). 13 million acres; Miguel Alemán (1946-52). 10 million. In all, 93 million acres, nearly 20% of Mexico's total area, were handed over to 2,000,000 landless peons, who organized themselves into ejidos (agricultural cooperatives). But Ruiz Cortines, whose term expires in December, had accounted for only 7,500,000.
Cactus-grey Cananea Ranch escaped land reform until last week because it is unlit for farming; arid most of the year, it is used for grazing at the ratio of ten acres per head of cattle. Reformer Cárdenas himself said it should never be divided, and even President Ruiz Cortines did not plan to expropriate. He negotiated first to buy the ranch for $2,160,000. But when hassles among the Greene heirs threatened to delay the closing for years, the President dispatched the Agriculture Minister with an expropriation decree and ended the matter with a few legalisms.
The U.S. owners will get the previously agreed price. And despite all the excitement, the waiting peasants themselves will probably get none of the land. Since it is unsuitable for small farms the ranch will likely be kept intact and operated by a cattlemen's cooperative.
Most Popular »
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- Is Running Bad for Your Knees? Maybe Not
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Protecting the Pope: Keeping Him Safe But Open
- Up in the Air: What Does 10 Million Miles Get You?
- What Smoking Ban? The French Are Lighting Up in Public Again
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- In Sri Lanka, Tsunami Anniversary Inspires Mixed Reactions
- Sherlock Holmes: Impressive Abs, Unmemorable Action
- Is Running Bad for Your Knees? Maybe Not
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- What Smoking Ban? The French Are Lighting Up in Public Again
- Up in the Air: What Does 10 Million Miles Get You?
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- In Sri Lanka, Tsunami Anniversary Inspires Mixed Reactions
- Nine: Not a 10 and Certainly Not an 8-1/2
- Study: TV May Perpetuate Race Bias
- New York City: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao





RSS