|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
CONFERENCES: Down to Business
The Western delegates arrived in Geneva in a mood of no nonsense, no politics and not much hope. This was to be a scientific meeting of technical experts, but the Western scientists were uncertain whether the Eastern delegates would be in the same moodor whether the Eastern delegates would be there at all.
Just before the scheduled start of "The Conference of Experts to Study the Possibility of Detecting Violations of a Possible Agreement on Suspension of Nuclear Tests," the Russians had threatened to boycott the talks unless the U.S. first agreed in advance to a ban on nuclear tests. The U.S. and its allies (Britain, France, Canada), rejecting this Soviet propaganda gambit, ordered their scientists to hold the conference among themselves if the Communist delegates (from Russia, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Rumania) failed to show up. This proved to be a shrewd move: the Communists arrived suddenly, and the conference began on schedule and with brightened hopes.
Declared Chief Western Delegate James B. Fisk, the lean and deliberate executive vice president of Bell Telephone Laboratories: "We embark, with every hope, on what can well be a historic missionto lay the essential technical basis for the important decisions which lie ahead." To the Western scientists' surprise, Chief Soviet Delegate Yevgeny K. Fedorov, identified as a Soviet Sputnik specialist, spoke in the same vein. "It is not for us to decide the cessation of tests," he said. "This is up to the governments."
Although the Soviets inserted in their scientific delegation Semyon K. Tsarapkin, a professional cold-war curmudgeon and former Soviet United Nations delegate with a reputation for tirades against the West, the first private sessions were encouragingnot for the agreements reached but for the politics avoided. The delegates started exchanging papers that covered such "secret" ground that it was decided that not even their titles could be disclosed.
The blackboard was scribbled with equationsnot only for the benefit of the scientists but for the hapless interpreters and stenographers. Said one interpreter: "You just can't imagine how difficult it is to break down linguistic barriers between Nobel prizewinners in physics."
Most Popular »
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?
- Model Diets: How Celebrity Chefs Are Losing Weight
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Meg Whitman: Is California Ready for Another Celebrity Governor?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan
- Why Fake Snow Is Filling Beijing's Bird's Nest
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It
- Slow Times At My 20th High School Reunion
- Could Jacob Zuma Be the President South Africa Needs?
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Having It Both Ways in Advertising
- Riding the Waves of Irrational Behavior
- Shanghai: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Paris: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- The Dollar in Danger





RSS