Religion: Jesuits and Jews
Two of the five families involved in the suit that led to last June's Supreme Court decision outlawing the Regents' prayer in New York public schools were Jewish; such organizations as the American Jewish Committee and the New York Board of Rabbis enthusiastically endorsed the ruling. Last week, in an editorial addressed "To Our Jewish Friends," the Jesuit editors of America impetuously warned that conspicuous Jewish opposition to religious practices in public schools might lead to "an outbreak of anti-Semitism." The editorial contended that "certain spokesmen and leaders in the Jewish community . . . are now taking steps to consolidate the 'gains' which were made through the decision" to create a climate of opinion that would assist the Supreme Court in making similar decisions in the future on church-state separation, help stop legislation providing Government aid to church-affiliated schools. The time has come, America concluded, for Jewish leaders "to decide among themselves precisely what they conceive to be the final objective of the Jewish communityin a word, what bargain they are willing to strike as one of the minorities in a pluralistic society. When court victories produce only a harvest of fear and distrust, will it all have been worthwhile?" "Threatening & Patronizing." Jewish leaders responded as if the Jesuits had suggested that this was a good time for a pogrom. "America performs a disservice in raising the spectre of anti-Semitism," said Rabbi Elmer Berger of the American Council for Judaism. In a joint statement, the leaders of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations and the Central Conference of American Rabbis reacted "with chagrin and disappointment" to America's "threatening and patronizing statement," tossed back at the Jesuits a paraphrase of their own question: "What would be the Catholic reaction if a Jewish publication were to publish an editorial entitled 'To Our Catholic Friends,' warning Catholics to cease their campaign for public aid to parochial schools, lest a wave of anti-Catholic bigotry descend on the nation?"
Protestants and even other Catholics joined in chiding America. Dr. Truman Douglass of the United Church of Christ called the editorial "ill-advised." The lay edited Catholic weekly Commonweal pointed out that "our whole system would become meaningless if the various minority groups were made to fear any resort to the courts to judge their claims."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Toilets
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Female Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Malady?







RSS