THE ECONOMY: End of an Easygoing Era
Newsmen languidly covering President Eisenhower's vacation at Augusta, Ga. suddenly perked up last week when Treasury Secretary Robert B. Anderson and Defense Secretary Thomas S. Gates flew in from Washington for a 2½-hour huddle with their boss. Pressing topic: the U.S.'s nagging deficit in international payments and the resulting drain on U.S. gold reserves, eroding international confidence in the soundness of the dollar.
Next day the President sent ripples of concern spreading around the world with a sweeping presidential directive designed to slow the U.S.'s gold outflow by curbing U.S. spending overseas. "A definite improvement in our balance-of-payments situation is mandatory," said Ike, "not only to insure our economic well-being and military security here at home, but also to insure that the U.S. can continue as a strong partner in the future economic growth and military strength of the free world."
Farewell to Chauffeurs. What stirred up the biggest headlines was the President's order to reduce the number of U.S. servicemen's dependents living overseas from the present 484,000 to 200,000. But more momentous was the broad, tough order to Government departments to cut down on purchases of foreign goods and buy U.S. goods instead. Under the President's directive, the International Cooperation Administration (the main foreign-aid agency) will slap a ceiling on all expenditures that "do not finance direct procurement of U.S. goods and services," and so will the $300 million Development Loan Fund. The armed forces will cut down on offshore procurement, and U.S. post exchanges and commissaries overseas will stock only U.S. goods. At the same time the U.S. will twist every foreign arm in sight to get reductions in tariffs on American goods and thus boost U.S. exports.
In U.S. military settlements overseas, the news about dependents touched off flurries of dismayeven though the reduction is to be carried out gently and gradually, not by separating families already overseas, but by sending fewer dependents abroad in the future. Many a serviceman grumbled that he would not re-enlist if he could not have his wife and children with him overseas, and Army Secretary Wilber Brucker, playing his favorite role of Big Brother to Army dissidents, made things worse by warning of plunging morale. At a U.S. military colony near Paris, an Army officer's wife looked up from a children's party and said wistfully: "I just sent my husband's chauffeur to get a case of Coke.
I don't suppose I'll be able to do that any more, will I?"
Soft-Spoken Crusade. For the U.S., as for thousands of U.S. servicemen's wives, the presidential directive marked the end of an easygoing era. Since 1950, with the rebuilt economies of Western Europe and Japan giving the U.S. brisk competition in international trade, the U.S. has found itself running increasingly into the red in its overall international accounts.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Toilets
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Holiday Shopping: This Year It's a Game of Chicken
- Singh in Washington: Making the Case for India
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Toilets
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- The Dark Side of Darwin's Legacy
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer







RSS