The 23rd Amendment
Thanks to a succession of oversights by the Founding Fathers and early Congresses, the residents of the District of Columbia have never enjoyed one particular constitutional right cherished by all other Americans: the privilege of voting. There was no reasoning attending the oversights; it was just plain neglect.† Last week Rhode Island cast the 36th affirmative vote for the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution, giving 746,000 Washingtonians the right to vote in presidential elections and three electoral votes. Ohio and Kansas are expected to ratify the amendment this week, making the necessary two-thirds majority for official adoption (only one legislatureArkansasrejected the amendment outright, on the ground that 54% of the District's citizens are Negroes).
But after 161 years, Washingtonians will be limited to voting for the President and Vice President. They will continue to have no representative in Congress, no voice in their municipal government.
†One segment of the capital gained the right to vote in 1846, when one-third of the District's land area, now Arlington County, was ceded back to Virginia.
Most Popular »
- Ice Age vs. Transformers: It's a Draw!
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? Ten Questions and Answers
- Why Obama's Afghan War Is Different
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- The Challenge That Awaits Obama in Moscow
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Searching for Palin's 'Hot Photos'
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- Is There Hope for the American Marriage?
- How Bad Are Auto Sales? Ten Questions and Answers
- Why Obama's Afghan War Is Different
- Germany's Bright Idea: Street Lighting on Demand
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Why VW and Porsche are On a Collision Course
- The Honduran Coup: How Should the U.S. Respond?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live







RSS