|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Foreign Relations: A Strategy of Peace
FOREIGN RELATIONS
The cold war, President Kennedy felt, was a stalemate. He sensed a deepening international discouragement about the possibility that real progress toward a settlement would ever be made. Accordingly, several months ago, he began thinking about a major foreign policy speech that would be "positive." Last week, while receiving an honorary doctor of civil law degree at Washington's American University, he delivered that speech. In it, he announced that
1) a new attempt toward an "early agreement on a comprehensive test-ban treaty" will be made in high-level talks between Great Britain, the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. in Moscow in July, and
2) the U.S. will not resume nuclear testing in the atmosphere "so long as other states do not do so."
The President's speech was carefully timed. It would, hopefully, stand in favorable contrast to the bomb-rattling talk that almost always accompanies major Communist conclaves; the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is meeting this week, and the Russians and Chinese Reds will get together next month to try to iron out their differences. And the President's proposals would surely add to the acclaim he receives on his imminent European trip.
Dangerous & Defeatist. The speech was also carefullyand eloquently-worded. Excerpts:
"Too many of us think peace is impossible. But that is a dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitablethat mankind is doomedthat we are gripped by forces we cannot control. We need not accept that view. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. I am not referring to the absolute, infinite concepts of universal peace and good will. I do not deny the value of hopes and dreams, but we merely invite discouragement and incredulity by making that our only and immediate goal.
"Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peacebased not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institutions. World peace, like community peace, does not require that each man love his neighborit requires only that they live together with mutual tolerance, submitting their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement.
"No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find Communism profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievementsin science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture, in acts of courage."
Hate & Oppression. "We have never been at war with each other. And no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union in the Second World War. It is an ironic but accurate fact that the two strongest powers are the two in the most danger of devastation. All we have built, all we have worked for, would be destroyed in the first 24 hours.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- Can the Federal Government Really Create Jobs?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- The Chicago Suspect: Are Pakistani Jihadis Going Global?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Can the Federal Government Really Create Jobs?
- Max Baucus and His Women
- How Tiger Woods Can Survive the Scandal
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?





RSS