The Press: Its v. It's
A daring proposal caught the editors of the New York Times in mid-breath. "At the risk of losing my reputation," wrote Reader Doris Benardete from Brooklyn, "I advocate the dropping of the apostrophe. . . ."
Why, that very day, said Reader Benardete, she had found "its" and "it's" hopelessly mixed up in an advertisement in the Times. The apostrophe, she hinted, is about as useful as the vermiform appendix.
The embattled apostrophiles seized their pens and rushed to the defense. The Times offered editorially to split the difference, ban the apostrophe in plurals like 1890s "whether our own proofroom is for us or against us." It added a thank-you-ma'am: after bowing for years under questions of solemn import, the world could well use some small controversies.
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- Florida Grapples With Its Deadly Hit-and-Run Car Culture
- Germany's Doubts About Afghanistan Grow After Revelations About Air Strike
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- How Guatemala's Most Beautiful Lake Turned Ugly
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power







RSS