|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
ARMED FORCES: Upping the Re-Up
On May 26, 1954, Air Force Lieut. General Emmet ("Rosie") O'Donnell received a terse memo: "The Chief of Staff directs that a thoroughgoing study be made of Air Force organization, procedures and policies dealing with the re-enlistment problem." O'Donnell recognized the directive for what it was: a do-or-die order to solve a problem that had already become desperate.
Air Force re-enlistment was down to about 20%. The highest manpower losses were in the most-needed categories, the technicians and specialists whose training requires about four years. It was these men who were most attractive to private industry, and the Air Force found itself unable to compete.
O'Donnell put his heavy arm on square-jawed Brigadier General Richard H. Carmichael. a wartime flying pal in the Pacific theater (two Distinguished Service Crosses, two Silver Stars, four Legions of Merit, and the Air Medal with three oakleaf clusters). Around the Pentagon, Carmichael was unofficially dubbed "Vice President of the Air Force in charge of Re-enlistment."
Houses & Wives. To find out exactly why airmen were refusing in droves to "re-up,"' Carmichael set the Air Force Statistics Control Division to work. Questionnaires were sent to every twentieth airman: the returns were interesting.
As expected, pay and allowances were the major gripes among airmen of all ranksbut it also became clear that it would not take much of a pay raise to make the services genuinely competitive with civilian industry. The airmen wanted more and better housing for their families, improved maternity care for their wives.
The G.I. Bill of Rights itself had a backwash against reenlistment. By staying in the service, an airman deprived himself of thousands of dollars worth of veterans' rights, especially education. The Statistics Control Division survey showed that of the 80% refusing to re-up, 48.6% were headed for college under the G.I. Bill. The Air Force could offer little to dissuade them.
Among enlisted airmen, complaints varied by rank. Men in the lowest grades had classic grumbles: they thought the promotion system was unfair; they considered their noncoms and officers incompetent. The middle grades, e.g., airmen first class, were concerned about base and job assignments that seemed dictated by whim rather than reason.
The top-graded noncommissioned officers, among whom re-enlistment attrition was critical, were most resentful of their dwindling prestige and authority. Their complaint bore out a report of a joint-services study committee, headed by Rear Admiral J. P. Womble Jr., which found there had been a serious "dilution in mili tary authority and leadership." Said the Womble report: "The committee unanimously concludes that the professional standards have been permitted to deteriorate through lack of effective disciplinary control."
Rights & Incentives. Dick Carmichael and colleagues went to work. President Eisenhower was consulted, and under his sponsorship the 1955 military pay raise bill, with its built-in incentives to reenlist, was passed by Congress. So were measures giving servicemen an extra month's rental allowance for each permanent change of station and offering to men still in the services the home-mortgage rights now enjoyed by veterans.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- Is Running Bad for Your Knees? Maybe Not
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Protecting the Pope: Keeping Him Safe But Open
- Up in the Air: What Does 10 Million Miles Get You?
- What Smoking Ban? The French Are Lighting Up in Public Again
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- In Sri Lanka, Tsunami Anniversary Inspires Mixed Reactions
- Sherlock Holmes: Impressive Abs, Unmemorable Action
- Is Running Bad for Your Knees? Maybe Not
- How Christmas Is (Not) Celebrated in North Korea
- What Smoking Ban? The French Are Lighting Up in Public Again
- Up in the Air: What Does 10 Million Miles Get You?
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- Pakistan's Turmoil Endangers Its Archaeological Treasures
- China's Christmas Warning to Political Dissidents
- The World's Biggest Lottery
- New York City: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- In Sri Lanka, Tsunami Anniversary Inspires Mixed Reactions





RSS