|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Nation: The Fount
There were no cots in the cloakrooms, no pajama-clad Senators rubbing sleep from their eyes as quorum bells clanged in the middle of the night, no filibustering recitals of recipes for chicken gumbo and shrimp jambalaya. There was just a straightforward, rather lackluster debate that was cut off after a mere 24 days when the Senate invoked cloture. Next day, when President Johnson's voting-rights bill came to a final vote, the Senate approved it by a lopsided 77-to-19 margin and sent it to the House, where its passage is all but a foregone conclusion.
Throughout the debate, it was apparent that the forces of the segregationist South were beatenand knew it. "The way things are," North Carolina Democrat Sam Ervin said wryly, "I don't think I could even get a denunciation of the Crucifixion in the bill." When Georgia's Richard Brevard Russell, field general for the segregationists in a dozen civil rights battles of yore, returned to the Senate chamber from a long illness the day before the cloture motion came to a vote, he needed no more than a glance to see that the cause was hopeless. "If there is anything I could do," he said, "I would do it. But I assume the die is cast."
For Cloture. When the roll call on the crucial cloture vote began, Majority Leader Mike Mansfield and Minority Leader Everett Dirksen were fairly confident that they had the required two-thirds majority. But a shred of doubt remained right up to the end. "It's a case of depending on the Republican side," said Mansfield. That meant Ev Dirksen, and Dirksen had done his job of persuasion well. "This involves more than you," he told wavering colleagues. "It's the party. Don't drop me in the mud."
All told, only nine Republicans joined 21 Democrats to reject cloture. Dirksen mustered 23 Republicans, who together with 47 Democrats carried the motion 70 to 30three votes more than were needed. It was the second time that the Senate had ever cut off debate on a civil rights bill.
Automatic Trigger. The heart of the Senate bill is the "automatic triggering device." Under its terms, federal registrars (or "examiners," as the bill calls them) will be empowered to suspend literacy tests and register voters without them in states and counties where 1) such tests were used as a voting qualification as of last Nov. 1, and 2) less than 50% of the voting-age population were registered to vote or actually cast ballots in the 1964 presidential election. The device will automatically send federal examiners into Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and a number of counties in other states including North Carolina and Virginia. The triggering device was the main feature of the bill drafted by Administration lawyers and Dirksen's staff, but the Senate added a few wrinkles of its own by providing that: >In any county where the U.S. Census Director finds that less than 25% of the adult Negro population is registered, federal examiners may be appointed.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Sean Goldman: Home by Christmas
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Should the U.S. Destroy Jihadist Websites?
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- Will Bad Blood Scuttle the Pacquiao-Mayweather Fight?
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Sketchy Santas: When Christmas Gets Weird
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Holland's Plan to Tax Every Kilometer Driven
- Domestic Terror Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009
- Hong Kong: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Tapping Into India's Growing Alcohol Market





RSS