The Economy: Looking for the Whites Of the Enemy's Eyes

At an interesting watershed for the much manipulated U.S. economy, two of the nation's most prestigious economic voices last week prescribed the same course—for widely differing reasons. Gardner Ackley, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and William McChesney Martin, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, renewed the call for a tax increase to fend off inflation.

Ackley, testifying before the Congressional Joint Economic Committee, conceded that the economy in the first half of 1967 had performed "more sluggishly than we anticipated" and "is not advancing too rapidly today." Still, he forecast a hot second half. Said he: "A strong revival of demand is on the way —one that will produce either unacceptable inflationary pressures or a return to tight money, or more probably both, by early next year at the latest." Only a 1967 tax increase, by Ackley's recipe, will forestall such a future. Yet he an- noyed the committee members by refusing to be pinned down about either the size or the timing of the tax increase.

Not so Bill Martin, a much less political and much more independent man than Ackley, but nevertheless an early supporter of President Johnson's January request for a 6% surcharge on corporate and personal income taxes. Speaking to the Toledo Rotary Club, the FRB chairman bluntly urged higher taxes without delay. Moreover, he said he would back an increase even larger than 6%, "if warranted," after Congress makes this year's appropriations. Unlike Ackley, who based his argument on bullish expectations of a strongly rising market for durable goods, a burst of spending for factories, and an early end to the economic drag of falling business inventories, Martin accentuated the negative.

Martin's argument was founded on anticipation of a huge and inflationary federal budget deficit. Having closed the 1967 fiscal year July 1 with a deficit of about $11 billion, second highest since World War II, the Administration now estimates that the next year's will be $13.6 billion. Treasury Secretary Henry Fowler recently admitted that it might go as high as $24 billion, mostly because of the Viet Nam war. Warned Martin in Toledo: "We must have adequate, effective—and above all —prompt tax action that would whittle down the deficit to manageable proportions. Delay would permit inflationary forces to gain momentum."

Dark Spots. Behind the words of both Ackley and Martin lay the fact that the U.S. economy is pulling out of the winter downturn which is being called, in current vogue, the "mini-recession." Though the economy, as Martin noted, "is beginning to show signs of moving ahead again," many dark spots remain. Despite massive stimulation to business through an easing of credit and a sharp rise in federal spending, industrial production has slipped four months out of the past five on the Federal Reserve Board index; in May, it fell 2% below its December peak. The nation's real output of goods and services, in the first three months of this year, missed its clockwork quarterly advance for the first time since 1961.