Magazine content is available exclusively for TIME subscribers.The Law: Another No to Nixon
Faced with what he considered a profligate Congress, Richard Nixon transformed an occasional practice of former Presidents into a tactic of confrontation. Claiming he had a presidential right of impoundment, Nixon simply refused to spend at least $16 billion appropriated by Congress for a variety of projects. In 1973 the Supreme Court, aware that it might soon face more serious tests of presidential power, ducked the issue. Last week, with those problems behind them, the Justices turned to an impoundment-related suit and by a 9-to-0 vote delivered one more resounding no to the Nixon doctrine of Executive power.
The case involved Nixon's...
Email, Password or Region is incorrect
A required form parameter was missing.
The System is currently down. Please try again in a few minutes.
Email Address is invalid
Password is blank
Most Popular »
- Your Turn, Canada: A Second-By-Second Look at Jeremy Lin Lighting Up Toronto
- Linsanity Heads East, Linfects China and Taiwan
- Love Ever After: A Valentine’s Day Special
- Can Jeremy Lin End The MSG/Time Warner Cable War?
- After Whitney Houston, Musicians Say: I'm Afraid
- What's in Your Lipstick? FDA Finds Lead in 400 Shades
- Rick Santorum Wants to Fight 'The Dangers Of Contraception'
- Top 10 Famous Love Letters
- Move Over, Pajama Jeans: Dress-Pant Sweatpants Have Arrived
- Music: White Lies and The White Stripes
- Harvard's Hoops Star Is Asian. Why's That a Problem?
- With Syria's Rebels: A Visit to a Bombmaker's Factory
- Beirut: Where Valentine's Day Belongs to Another Kind of Saint
- Study: Lead Poisoning Could Lurk in Spices
- Europe's Deep Freeze: Why Climate Change Is Not (Entirely) to Blame
- Children of the New India: How Economic Reforms Impacted Upon the Young
- Friends With Benefits
- Iowa Welcomes Back China's Next President
- The Brain: The Mystery of Consciousness
- What Happens When We Die?
More News from Our Partners
Top Stories on TIME.com
Quotes of the Day »
