- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
The World: How Much Has Angola Hurt the U.S.?
President Ford and Secretary of State Kissinger have bitterly attacked Congress' ban on funds for the pro-Western forces in Angola. The administration argues that the nation's foreign policy may be so weakened by arbitrary congressional interference that the U.S. could lose the ability to inspire trustand, when necessary, fearin the rest of the world. "It cannot be in the interests of the United States," said Kissinger at a press conference last week, "to create the impression that in times of crisis, either threats or promises of the United States may not mean anything because our divisions may paralyze us."
These warnings are reminiscent of Administration pleas in early 1975 for last-ditch aid to failing anti-Communist governments in Saigon and Phnom-Penh. In the Wall Street Journal last week, Historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., charged the Administration with unnecessary hyperbole and suspect logic. "I strongly doubt," he argued, "that anyone in the Soviet Union is concluding today that . . . the Senate's action on Angola gives Moscow a blank check for foreign adventures."
The U.S. failure to back the anti-Communist forces in Angola surely casts some doubt on American strength and resolvebut how seriously? World reaction is divided, and opinion depends on proximity to the war-torn former Portuguese territory. In Africa, a number of moderate black leadersas well as South Africa's Prime Minister John Vorsterare clearly anguished. In general, the moderates are less concerned about direct Russian influence and bases in Angola than about the prospect that potential Soviet client states, beefed up with Russian military and economic aid, might be tempted to interfere in the domestic affairs of their neighborswith or without Moscow's approval. Zambia is already concerned about subversion by the M.P.L.A. regime in Luanda. Kenya and Ethiopia are afraid that Somalia, a major recipient of Moscow's largesse, might try to revive its longtime dream of a "greater Somalia" by pushing its territorial claims into southern Ethiopia and northeastern Kenya, where many ethnic Somalis live. The Nairobi government also fears that Soviet aid to Uganda might inspire its volatile President Idi Amin to push a corridor to the Indian Oceanthrough Kenya.
U.S. ambassadors in Africa have tried to reassure moderate leaders, but doubts remain that Washington would do much to help them resist aggression by ambitious Soviet clients. Says one moderate African President: "American credibility is now suspect. If the Soviets were blatantly to try to subvert my country tomorrow, I'd think we might get sympathetic, clucking noises out of Washington, but not much else."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Obama and Counterterrorism: The Debate Moves Right
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- A Tree Carving in California: Ancient Astronomers?
- U.S. Troops Prepare to Test Obama's Afghan War Plan
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Obesity in Kids: Three Lifestyle Changes that Help
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- Stuck Elevators Close Dubai Skyscraper
- Trying to Revitalize a Dying Small Town
- What Asia Can Really Teach America
- Egypt's New Challenge: Sinai's Restive Bedouins
- In Marriage, Worse First Can Mean Better Later
- Prescription for a Turnaround





RSS