|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Letters, Jan. 8, 1979
Coming Together
To the Editors:
As an experienced convention-goer (Dec. 18], I penned these lines:
This is what you 'II likely find
As your daily fests unwind:
A time to eat, a time to meet;
But none to rest your aching feet.
This is what you'll likely hear
If you keep in tune by ear:
The talks the talkers have talked before.
The puns the punners punencore!
The gab the gabbers gabbed of yore.
The gripes the gripers gripe galore.
(The Rev.) Leslie Conrad Jr.
Richardson, Texas
Convention fever seems to be extremely contagious here in the U.S. Our only hope is that someone, somewhere, will come up with a cure for that dreaded disease.
Thomas O'Dell
Bantam, Conn.
So conventions don't pollute or put any burden on municipal services? The garbage people and sewer workers could submit evidence to the contrary. Enlightened promoters should concede that 26 million conventioneers leave other things than money in the host city.
C. W. Gaylord
Williamsville, N. Y.
Will Rogers saw it first. Said he in his daily column of May 2, 1930: "When Judgment Day comes, half of America will be on their way to some convention and the other half will be signing application blanks."
Bryan Sterling
New York City
Rocky's Clones
As an art student, I was greatly disheartened by Rockefeller's scheme to sell reproductions of his collection [Dec. 18]. I work hard on my original pieces. Yet how can I compete with timeless entities such as Rodin or Modigliani? These "clone"' collectors don't want artthey want status symbols. Why don't they buy a Mercedes instead? At least they can drive that.
Leslie Howat
Hatboro, Pa.
Why the fierce attack? Rockefeller made it clear he was offering copies and told at what price they were available. Nobody is deceived. If people think such copies are worth their price, they will buy them. If not, Rockefeller has made a good effort but a bad deal. So be it.
C.H. de Jong
Great Barrington, Mass.
Doctors' Dilemma
The best doctors will never need to advertise [Dec. 11], and for the worst ones, advertising will be an additional expense to pass on to their patients. Medical advertising will help the consumer about as much as car advertising protects the buyer of an automobile.
Maralys Wills
Santa Ana, Calif.
Physicians who develop new treatments and new techniques have voluntarily accepted a professional ethic that they publish these findings for the use of all physicians in the treatment of all patients. If the FTC puts physicians in the position of price competition by destroying their ethical ban on advertising, they should expect that a physician who develops an effective new treatment will keep it a secret and sell it to the highest bidder rather than publish it for the use of all. I do not believe that to be a wise exchange.
John R. Dykers Jr., M.D.
Siler City, N.C.
NATO Déjà Vu
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?
- Model Diets: How Celebrity Chefs Are Losing Weight
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It
- College Campus Smoking Bans Have Some Saying 'Lighten Up'
- Slow Times At My 20th High School Reunion
- Why Fake Snow Is Filling Beijing's Bird's Nest





RSS