Straining the Ties that Bind
With troubles elsewhere, Moscow cuts its Indochina aid
A joke currently circulating in Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) recounts an apocryphal exchange of cables between Hanoi and Moscow. "Tighten your belts," wires Moscow in response to a Vietnamese plea for increased economic aid. Hanoi's reply: "Please send belts."
Such black-market humor contains more than a morsel of truth. Ever since the People's Republic of China canceled its Vietnamese development programs in 1978, the Soviet Union has supplied the Southeast Asian nation with everything from brandy to ball bearings. Since January 1979, when the Vietnamese invasion of neighboring Kampuchea (formerly Cambodia) caused most Western nations to suspend their Viet Nam aid programs, Hanoi's dependence on the Soviet Union has become near total. Today, money from Moscow is an important component of the economies of Kampuchea and Laos, and most especially of Viet Nam, which receives about $3 million a day in Soviet assistance.
The Soviet Union is already burdened by the effects of overcentralized planning and lagging industrial and agricultural production, of shouldering the Polish debt and of financing a war in Afghanistan. Lately, the U.S.S.R. has been selling gold to make up for a currency shortage caused by a serious shortfall in last year's grain harvest. As a result, Moscow has been cutting back on its aid to all of Southeast Asia. The Soviets were forced to reduce their 1981 grain shipments to Kampuchea by almost half, from a promised 100,000 tons to only 55,000. The price Viet Nam pays br Soviet petroleum rose from $4 to $16 per bbl. in 1981. This year, oil-import subsidies for Laos have been ended.
The percentage of aid supplied to Kampuchea by the entire Communist world is declining. Since October 1979, 488 million has been provided by the Soviet bloc. Last year the total was $103 million, and only five socialist countriesmainly the Soviet Union and East Germanycontributed at all. By comparison, 50 non-Communist donor nations to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) sent $190 million in relief aid to Kampuchea in 1981.
This groupwhich includes Austria, India, the U.S., Israel and Thailandwill meet at the U.N. in New York City this week to decide the amount of assistance Kampuchea needs for the coming year. During the past four months, three separate U.N. missions have found that Kampuchea is short 278,000 pounds of food. Rice shipments alone will cost $500 a ton.
Without continued high levels of humanitarian aid to Kampuchea, Viet Nam will be hard pressed to maintain its presence there. Hanoi is in debt for $3 billion in foreign currency, almost half from non-Communist countries. Thus when those donor nations meet this week they will be confronted by a difficult moral and political choice: either to provide aid to Kampuchea and risk subsidizing the communization of the Khmer people, or to stop it and risk losing thousands of innocent lives.
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular
-
Most Read
- Will Citigroup Survive? Four Possible Scenarios
- Looking Ahead: A Bad Recession or Something Worse?
- Why Sasha and Malia Will Go to Sidwell Friends
- Why Obama Wants Hillary for His 'Team of Rivals'
- Government Jobs Looking Better in the Downturn
- Plastic Surgery Below the Belt
- Obama Picks Geithner, an Insider, for Treasury
- In Mexico's Drug War, Bad Cops Are a Mounting Problem
- Is Obama's Energy Plan Enough?
- The Breadbasket of South Korea: Madagascar
-
Most Emailed
- Will Citigroup Survive? Four Possible Scenarios
- In the Downturn, Government Jobs Looking Better
- The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Schools
- Why Sasha and Malia Will Go to Sidwell Friends
- In Mexico's Drug War, Bad Cops Are a Mounting Problem
- The Breadbasket of South Korea: Madagascar
- Looking Ahead: A Bad Recession or Something Worse?
- Tuned In - TIME.com » Blog Archive The True Demeaning of Christmas, Colbert-Style «
- TIME Cover: The New New Deal - Nov. 24, 2008
- November 22, 2008 - November 28, 2008 - Cartoons of the Week - TIME
Mixx





RSS