National Affairs: Common Practices
(2 of 2)
What Dana Smith says he did would not be open to the question of propriety if Dana Smith were a Republican Party treasurer, mailing out the statements of and arranging speeches for all the party's spokesmen in his state. Smith, however, performed that function not for the whole party but for the Nixon faction. One reason for secrecy was that Nixon's people wanted to avoid a factional clash with the Warrenites, who work the same ground for campaign contributions. (Some, but not all, of Nixon's contributors also contribute to Warren's campaigns.)
In ethics or in plain propriety, Nixon's fund invites the same kind of scrutiny that should be turned on any public man who gets outside personal or political income. In such cases, the question: "Did this money influence him?" is always valid. But the validity of the question is one thing. The automatic assumption that a man is tainted because he uses political contributions to cover his political expenses is something else again.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- (Vetted) Question Time: Obama's Chinese Town Hall
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- World Leaders Put Off a Climate Change Treaty
- Box-Office Weekend: 2012 Masters Disaster
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- Postcard from Minneapolis
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao







RSS